Interaxis hub script pastebin

Name;Character[“Bang w bun”].Parent:FindFirstChild “Torso” or ld.I wouldn’t say a lot are writing research papers but yes the majority aren’t infantry.That’s why I’m telling you, ignore what he says he believes about Federal power and the libertarian view, and look at what he acts like he believes about Federal power.Conclusion So these were the simple steps about opening a vanguard business account.Useful Blogs.Funny how everyone in this sub is terrified of “martial law” and losing their rights, but are the first ones to blindly defend dirty cops no matter what they’ve done.A Part that … Roblox coding is a great way to learn text-based computer programming, and Roblox Studio is a You will learn functions such as Move, Scale, Rotate, and the basics of getting around the Roblox.If they are offered food, water, and other resources the masses will be fighting for in trade for their cooperation Compare this to gay marriage I Interaxis hub script pastebin don’t like when I’m half asleep and go to take a piss and it hits the lid and sprays all over my feet so no you lose everyone should be responsible for putting the seat Interaxis hub script pastebin they want it before using the bathroom period.And in my opinion that is how any revolution should start.He had a “hands off” policy on gay marriage which is the current working policy and he wanted to end the war on drugs.For example, you bringing up BLM.He said explicitly that their primary mission was infiltrating and disrupting movements.But there’s more who would murder the mouth-foaming murderers if they did do any national anthem murdering.Parent:breakJoints”cB:play”end end end end end;wait’.Sorry, I’m not speaking to this point at all.Drag it on long enough and I believe the will of the military would break first.
thebedandbreakfastdirectory.com — I Don\’t Feel So Good Simulator

NEW FURK SCRIPT HUB – Now run the cheat Raduga.Therefore, you should uninstall and reinstall Skype from the Microsoft admin center.The Virginia Slave codes were created to create the divisiveness shortly after the rebellion.I’m trying to create a custom vehicle script, and it works for the most part, but when I try to rotate the steering wheels using CFrame, it snaps back to place after an instant because of what I assume to be the weld that’s connected to the immovable axis.He just wants you to think that.

This game has many affiliates, mostly groups which help keep the peace in its 3 main locations, namely The … Roblox, the Lego-like virtual world with blocky landscapes, is adding an option today for its 5 million monthly active players to roam a world with.CFrame is short for Coordinate Frame that holds the position and rotation vectors.

If there are any obstructions where the model is to be moved to, such as Terrain or other BasePart s, then the model will be moved up in the Y direction until there is nothing in the way.

Help and Feedback Scripting Support.Note that rotation is not preserved when moving a model with MoveTo.You can then click somewhere in your scene to place the model.You can weld all of the parts of the model together, and then move any one part using CFrame.Only the administrators of the official Roblox will have this emblem.

Set the CFrame on the client.I’m trying to create a custom vehicle script, and it works for the most part, but when I try to rotate the steering wheels using CFrame, it snaps back to place after an instant because of what I assume to be the weld that’s connected to the Roblox Vehicle Simulator Codes For Free Cash July borderpolar.He was the Creative Director of Roblox from to In studio I place this goal part at the position in which I … Roblox is a massively multiplayer game where players can interact with the place and use the chat interact, the first thing you need to do is know how to move around.

You can do that in the Properties window.So in this case, the part would move halfway to Part2.Before we get into the actual code of the platformer, it is important to understand how Roblox games are structured.

Even after using.Roblox is one of the most popular online building games in The Position is part of a CFrame, along with a rotation matrix that defines how the object is oriented.ROBLOX is a great idea – letting kids create their own online worlds that they can share with friends – but is pretty rough around the edges.

The other arrow keys will rotate your screen in their respective directions.Roblox Turrets local – Pastebin.Now, select the brick in Workspace that you wish to CFrame.Before you can access the Character property, you need to get the player’s object.The basic keys that most players use is the WASD system.In a game I’m developing, I found a free model car.Is it possible to CFrame orbit a model so that all the objects in the model move with it?

I am trying to make a planet orbit another planet but the debris on one planet gets left behind and doesn’t follow the planet that is orbiting the MAIN planet.

A simple model is created in the Workspace and a loop is started that will rotate the model 10 degrees around the Y axis every 0.The rotation matrix is either the rotation matrix of the user-defined PrimaryPart, or if not specified then a part in the Model chosen by the engine.And also i have welded 2 hitbox and another vfx mesh with weld constraint so they can turn and move with player all together.

Ok, so I’ve started using roblox studio recently, and I’ve gotten the hang of the basics I think This website was created by Roblox members to replace the official forums because Roblox shut them down Join us if you like Thanks for the video, but I know how to make an object move.You may think you know so much about adopt me.Astronomia coffin dance piano sheets i roblox got talent victory play 7 years on virtual piano.Selection:Get [1] v.Object Orientation.What’s nice about this approach is that if you transform the PrimaryPart of a Model with these methods, all of the other parts in the Model will also transform to maintain their offset from the PrimaryPart.

If you’re new to scripting, you’ve come to the right place.Returns a Vector3 that is union of the extents of all Parts in the model.Moving around in Roblox is actually very simple.Angles 0,0,math.

First moves model by primary part CFrame, second moves model by the center of the model.Opening the game page, click on Play and go into the game.Roblox speed hack.Nevermore is a ModuleScript loader for Roblox, and loads modules by name.

Move the green spheres to rotate the object.When a player joins the server, the function fe utg.Roblox – Argument 1 missing or nil.

Current users total million and counting, with 64 million active users every month.This copy of the game is called the Server.Help is appriechiated, thank you for your Roblox Studio lets you create anything and release with one click to smartphones, tablets, desktops, consoles, and virtual reality devices Reach Millions of Players Connect with a massive audience by tapping into an incredibly enthusiastic and international community of over 50 million monthly players body.

Roblox Spawn Function.It is made up of a positional component and a rotational component.Hope this was helpful.This function has been deprecated.Angles 0, 0 Pastebin.CrillicD CrillicD February 8, , pm 1.You can then move an object freely by clicking and dragging it around the game window.You can position a part just like you would using the Position property.

CFrame of the Model ‘s Model.Everyday a new Roblox promo code comes out and we keep looking for new codes and update the post as soon as they come.While true do repeat part.About Roblox rotate.Roblox is an online game platform and game creation system that was first launched in Baca selengkapnya ».

It can be used to accurately position BaseParts through their CFrame property, which unlike Position, allows the part to be rotated.Then make a new CFrame, and rotate it by a CFrame.The three inputs of note are as.GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Learn Roblox Studio and how to build experiences.How to move HumanoidRootPart whilst playing an roll animation? Scripting Help.Here is a Roblox speed script to help you move faster: game.

Roblox robloxaestheticoutfits robloxboyoutfits 1.In the same way, before creating a model, we need a place to start over.You’ll be satisfied with us, as our service is the best.How to Obtain: RGB wings was only obtained.Name then coroutine.Name the LocalScript CameraScript and add a comment at the top.There is a lot of free script executors available, however if you decide to search for ….Workspace g:makeJoints g:MoveTo game.

Posted: 1 week ago 1.To get a player’s position server side you need to access the player’s character property.The other user is probably just trying to make you mad.

A position applies to an object’s absolute location in the game.In this video, I demonstrate how you can use CFrame to move part.Make sure you dont move it to the left or right manually or else it breaks.I tried to unanchor it and it kinda worked, what happened was I could move and the handle was … Kinda stupid but; think like a tree.CFrame, short for coordinate frame, is a data type that describes a 3D position and orientation.Lua 5.To insert a 3D model or object, click it on the 3D models pane and select a color.

How can I move a Models Position with code? What is my best suggestion is to make an hitbox then anchor it, disable the can collide and make it transparent, use that hitbox as a primary part CFrame and use Model:SetPrimaryPartCFrame CFrame, how to make a model move in roblox.Trees are a 3D object, the entire function of a tree is based on the leaves branching out to capture sunlight.

I am struggling trying to figure out how to move the whole model.To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Advertised as an “Imagination Platform,” Roblox is quite a unique system: it allows users to play multiple games hosted on the platform or create their own.

The AK series has its own 5.For example, baking three batches of six cupcakes, or assigning weapons to players on two teams.Knowing how to gain access to player coordinates in Roblox can be a complicated and obscure process.Join my Discord Server and talk to me! When: Oct.

Where: Mitchell Park Courtyard, Palo Alto Weekly.The Eagle.I’ve chosen dropbox because it is one of my favorite apps as there are several apps on the app store that offer cloud service much cheaper than dropbox, but there is the design of the app that holds its users like me for using it.For only the second time in the world, doctors at the University of Chicago Medicine Comer Children’s Hospital and the Department of Neurosurgery used a minimally invasive surgery to disconnect.

We provide the official link and a number of helpful pages for the login above.They are reliable sites collected by LoginNote.Please check it thoroughly! It is certain that your login experience is very valuable for other users.We will really appreciate if you can share it with us.Please check it.For each search from the user, besides the login link, we also provide relevant information such as register guiding, requirements, and accounts.Sure, you can.

Roblox catalog script – Pastebin.Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time.Login Sign up.Roblox catalog script.Jan 3rd, Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features! Visit site.Any Catalog Item – Pastebin.Jan 29th, Sign Up , it unlocks many cool features! Catalog Heaven Gui – Pastebin.Jul 26th, Free Catalog – Pastebin.Sep 8th, Free Catalog Items – Pastebin.API tools faq.Free Catalog Items.Nov 26th, Pastebin pastebin.

Pastebin Login Sign up.Feb 2nd, : Never: 1, None – Public Pastes.Creative Bloomers Fandom.Roblox ca.Roblox soulshatters script pastebin Feb 21, Discover the best free exploits in ROBLOX, SK8R is currently the best new model 3 robux items all new toyota models alto Roblox get any item from the catalog?

Feb 21, Pastebin.Hat Hub – Rscripts the perfect place for the best Roblox Legends Of Speed Auto-Farm.Apr 24, Saber Simulator Auto Farm.Apr 18, FE Car Script – Rscripts the perfect place for the best Pretty fun FE script! Allows you to drive a Car with or without the Car accessory.

Made by Lozarth, enjoy! Why does my download keeps getting deleted or wont download at all? If you are unable to download the.A very epic script, can move all objects Unanchored in all games.By admin, 3 months.Catalog heaven script – millionaireornothing.Odst orbital drop shock troopers sc.Roblox Catalog Script Daily Catalog trend daily-catalog.It is obtainable in the Celebrity Collection Series 3.As of December 26, it has been favorited times.

Aimbot script rb world 2 pastebin.Works on all the devices january duration.Roblox catalogue hack.Dec 17th, By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.Any gamepass for free script leaked – Club Dark Roblox Exploit new clubdark.

If it doesn’t work, leave the game and try again, I tried just one time and this worked.It appears it worked.User scripts for roblox.Author roblox gamer julianpblo Daily installs 3 Total installs 6, Ratings 5 1 3 Created Updated ; Free 10 Million Robux prank! Free store items do not require any Robux to purchase.Free items are often released as part of a special promotion and sometimes they are only available for a limited time.

This page only contains free items that you can get from the catalog.You can also find “free” items on some of our other pages such as Promo Codes, and Creator Challenges.Health Details: Pastebin.Useful Blogs.This is as fast as opening a new Gmail id; for different brokers; it needs a few days till they do any background investigation on you.Instead of just saving money on it, you will keep your financial assets, such as shares or forex positions, in your account.Opening an account is always free.

To learn more about trading accounts, read our article on this topic.Unless you have a permanent residence in the USA, we recommend finding another broker.To open an account with an online broker, you usually need to provide proof of identity and proof of residence.Ideally, this process is entirely digital.The problem is that some brokers eventually require physical copies of your documents.This is a great broker to start your investment journey.

And then, you can attach more supplies to your account, succeeding as you become more encountered in handling your investments.Each of them has specific needs and characteristics.Most online brokers offer different interpretations based on your identity or experience, the nature of the traded products, the currencies available, and personal investment advice.

Of course, each brokerage company will offer slightly different packages.Unfortunately, Vanguard only offers trading in one currency, the USD.This is important because if you deposit funds in currencies other than the base currency, your money will be converted into USD.To save on exchange fees, you can start a multi-currency bank account.Both Transferwise and Revolut bank accounts give excellent currency exchange rates in many currencies and free or cheap international bank transfers.

It only takes a few minutes to open an account on your phone.The steps of open an vanguard business account The specific process of opening an account in Vanguard may differ slightly from the details here, but it usually involves the following steps: Choose your account Before you submit any of your personal information, make sure you have chosen the correct type of brokerage account for you.Make your choice on the registration page, and then go to the next step.Add personal info The next move is to go over the essential knowledge inquiry.

You will need to provide your name, date of birth, address, nationality, employment, etc.The complexity of this step depends on the broker you choose.You will also need to answer some security questions to ensure that you are legally allowed to trade and some questions about your trading experience.

This could be a passport, an identity card, or a bank statement.Exact requirements vary by broker.Some online brokers will ask you to send physical copies of your documents.

This can significantly delay the account opening process.Seal the deal Once you have made it through essential registration and identification, you will have the opportunity to review the information you have provided and enter into a virtual agreement after agreeing to the terms and conditions of your chosen broker.

Fund your account Once your account is verified and opened, you can start trading.At least transfer the deposit, or if there is none, transfer any amount to your broker account and move on! Now you are an investor! Conclusion So these were the simple steps about opening a vanguard business account.You can open your account easily by following the steps.For further information visit our site.Some so many Windows users have reported problems in getting logging in or creating issues while entering their username or password.

This issue has been encountered on more than one version of windows that ranges from old versions like windows 7 to the newer advanced windows Here we will discuss how to fix Skype login issues on windows to look into the problems and offer potential solutions: If Skype does not Accept Username and Password Several windows users have reported their problem within the process of Skype login.

Some users complained that Skype is not accepting his username and password; however, they uninstalled and re-installed so many times to resolve the issue.If your Windows is not updated yet, there is a better chance you may run into all types of errors.It includes login problems as well.

Any Catalog Item – Pastebin.com

MistHub Script (Phantom Forces) (Jailbreak) (Roblox) (script) Interaxis Hub babyaspect.· MiztHub(5) SUPER OP SCRIPT FOR PET SIMULATOR X PASTEBIN.Roblox Fe Gui Pastebin Utg Script Pastebin The Ultimate Trolling Gui to bigjohnny/Interaxis-hub development by creating an account on GitHub.Catalog Script Pastebin​and the information around it will be available here.Hat Hub – Rscripts the perfect place for the best Roblox.

How to use:

  1. S or aq.
  2. Torso:GetChildren do v.
  3. Find the latest spotify technology s.
  4. To get a player’s position server side you need to access the player’s character property.
  5. First thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.
[Best Leaked Paid Hub] Roblox FE Interaxis Hub Script Showcase!, time: 2:25

Roblox move model cframe

Further, one’s opinion, honestly, is not going to effect a change in a term or even two terms.I remember back in when I was very apolitical , the liberals then were screaming, “OMG, you can’t even consider George Bush I didn’t care much for either candidate then, but I knew that if there was a vacancy, a conservative leaning judge probably would be appointed, but that did not guarantee he would only write pro-life opinions, and further, even if said justice was a rabid, singular minded pro-lifer, it would only matter if a case on point was granted certiorari and heard That’s a lot of hoops.

To me, the whole argument was unnecessary panic.But they did it again in You had an amazing bipartisan grass roots movement for Ron Paul, running on a lot of principles of Obama’s campaign which turned out to be a masterful swindle.Ron Paul wanted out of the interventionist wars, he wanted to sever wall street and federal government ties, ending the Fed, end bailouts, end quantitative easing, promote transparency, support whistleblowers, etc.

It was simply a candidate with integrity who was not going to play the game in Washington.But in interviews, when asked about his abortion stance, he answered honestly and said he was pro-life, but that this view was personal and he didn’t believe in influencing policy based on his personal views [He did however believe that — like gay marriage and following the doctrine of federalism — that states should decide for themselves.

That one particular view turned every liberal against him and of course later, there were the so-called racist newsletters which were so distorted by the media , not to mention the fact that countless primaries were stolen from him But my point is And anyway, such a view almost certainly will not upset the current policy in place with Roe.

But in interviews, when asked about his abortion stance, he answered honestly and said he was pro-life, but that this view was personal and he didn’t believe in influencing policy based on his personal views.Well, ok, but did you look up what he actually did?

Or was his lip service enough? Because what he did was attempt to pass legislation to ban abortion at the Federal level every single year he served in Congress.So much for his view being personal ; individual choices about the sanctity of life is just a little too much personal freedom for ol’ Ron Paul.

This is legal and complicated.I don’t know what he voted for.But the federal government can only do certain things.The President, Congress, Courts, all have enumerated powers.If it’s not specified as something they can do in the Constitution, then they can’t do it.

One one hand, some people wanted it But opponents said, “Why? The Constitution gives power from the people to the federal government, so it follows that anything not given is automatically retained And further, in years, people might believe that this bill of rights merely enumerates a finite list of rights—at the exclusion of all others.They agreed on the Bill of Rights, or Ten Amendments to the Constitution, but only with the following 9th and 10th amendments.

These amendments are:.The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

First, I know how things have evolved today, and that the Constitution is ignored.Essentially our government is illegal.But Ron Paul can’t vote on a bill to ban abortion at the federal level because the federal government has no rights whatsoever as it pertains to abortion—either in the Constitution or derived from common law.What Roe did was in a very vague and convoluted way bring it under substantive due process stating that a woman could have an abortion I think the outcome is good I’m pro-choice , but I think the way it was done was flawed and if you read the opinion, somewhat of a reach.

Compare this to gay marriage I loved it when fucking Bush was saying that he was going to pass a law prohibiting gay marriage That’s ludicrous! The federal government has no power whatsoever to say word one about marriage.What finally happened with gay marriage is what should have happened: the federal government just stopped talking about it, and the states were left to decide on their own.

Historically, things like marriage and family have always been governed by reach individual state it’s how most laws should be It’s like pot laws now So Ron Paul was not voting to “ban abortion” in any way.He was however trying to proceed the same way that Gay Marriage ultimately resolved itself: take federal hands off of it, let the states decide.But then of course liberals heard this and immediately thought that every woman was going to be forced to go back to coat hanger abortions in alleyways.

But in or in other words in our more enlightened era today this would not happen.But they would not last.Public policy and common sense would overrule the moronic religious right in time.Look, I mean, you can look up his record yourself – he regularly voted for bills that would have made abortion illegal at the Federal level, by finding for fetuses a Federal right not to be aborted.He absolutely was voting to ban abortion at the Federal level, which indicates he absolutely believed the Federal government had the Constitutional authority to do so.

Look, you said yourself you don’t know what he voted for.Why don’t you educate yourself on what Ron Paul does, instead of what he says?

The theories of government by which he actually tries to govern, instead of what he purports to govern by? I’d be happy to.He has a huge congressional record and I don’t even know what years or the name of the bill..I’m only saying that until Roe there was no way the federal government could do anything regarding abortion.With Roe they used medical necessity and legal gymnastics to fit it into a substantive due process right.I’ll concede that RP might have been voting to simply remove abortion from the purview of the federal government.

If George Bush had brought a Supreme Court Case to place all marriage under the domain of the federal government which would then allow Congress to pass a law prohibiting gay marriage , it would be the same as someone voting on a bill which removed marriage from being under the authority of the federal government I’m saying it’s a different goal.

Voting to take abortion out of the hands of the federal government so the federal government would have no authority over it is not the same as “banning it”, and banning then would apply to the entire country.

The drug laws ban “drugs” at the federal level, so no matter what the states have as their drug laws, the federal laws control and they are illegal.So if RP was voting to create a law that banned abortion as a federal statute , it would apply to every state, and that would have been a huge issue that would have been brought up every time he sat down for any interview RP was far more of a “no law” or “less law” kind of guy as opposed to more laws.

So I could see him voting for removing all laws having to do with abortion at the federal level All of that is fully in the public record, and I definitely linked it to you as well.You can read the text and explanation of the bills Ron Paul submitted to Congress.But you’re mistaken.For instance, the Federal government could have passed a constitutional amendment banning abortion throughout the country, which could then be ratified by a majority of the states, thereby banning abortion in all of them.

That’s the most extreme example – what Ron Paul actually tried to do was backdoor-ban it at the Federal level by finding a constitutional right of individual fetuses not to be aborted, which would have the same effect, because the states cannot restrict your Federal constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment.I don’t understand what you think you’re “conceding” there.I mean I’m directly telling you that’s not the case.

Ron Paul’s proposed legislation would not have removed abortion from the purview of the Federal government; it would have banned abortion by requiring the Federal government to prosecute any abortion as the murder of a US citizen.Voting to take abortion out of the hands of the federal government so the federal government would have no authority over it is not the same as “banning it”.

Yes, I get that.But that’s not what Ron Paul ever attempted to do.What he repeatedly voted for was a ban on abortion that applied universally within the borders of the United States, and which would have pre-empted state authority of the issue altogether, by the supremacy clause.Well, unless people accepted his lip service at face value instead of looking into his record.

You know, like you did.I’ll look it up But if this was actually what he was trying to do, then fuck If he was actually drafting the bills you speak of, then he was one of the most hypocritical men who has ran for president in the past fifteen years.

I realize I don’t know the man personally, so I can’t claim to know his true intentions But I’ve looked at parts of his voting record and never saw anything like this but you can’t always tell by names of bills.

But if he really was engineering an end around to Roe and such endeavors were motivated purely on his personal beliefs then these actions would stand in diametric opposition to his oft-stated philosophy of government: that representatives act on behalf of their constituents, and the federal government should act within the parameters of the Constitution: echoed in his views to end the drug war or require that Congress declare war, etc.In other words, the federal laws and executive power must fall within specifically enumerated authority granted by the Constitution.

This is like telling me that the Beatles were a boy band manufactured by EMI and Capital records, with all their songs written by a team of songwriters headed by Neil Diamond and Glen Cambell.How is that in any way newsworthy? I think you’re severely underestimating how common the knowledge is that Ron Paul’s libertarianism is a total hypocritical sham.A bill that redefines personhood to conception, has at its core a philosophical debate and not Legal one.

I don’t agree with it, but I can see how he could reconcile such a bill with his views as a libertarian.Does that “sanctity of life” bill sound authoritarian to you? It’s simply redefining when life starts.Through that redefinition, I acknowledge there would be secondary effects, but I don’t think it makes his “libertarianism” a sham.

I’d have to read the entire bill, but my guess is that it was a way for him to implement his pro-life views but allow him to sleep at night.Further, the pro-life perspective, though it’s inherently flawed, is rooted in that person who subscribes to pro-life believing that, through some kind of imaginary subjugation they are the voice of the fetus, so they believe that pro-choice rights infringe on them.

I agree it’s not a legal argument, and I disagree with it entirely, yet I still empathize or at least try to with the way they feel.It’s the way I’d want to be treated.

Sure, but for the explicit and sole purpose of banning abortion.It wouldn’t apply to, say, calculating your age for any legal purpose – your legal age wouldn’t be advanced 9 months to account for the extra time, retroactively, that you had been a person.That indicates that this is just Ron Paul reasoning backwards from the outcome he’d like – a total ban on abortion within the borders of the United States.

I mean it does – what’s libertarian , explicitly, about the Federal government determining on behalf of the states when life begins? If the people of California desire to affirm that life begins at birth, for what reason does Ron Paul override that view with his own more restrictive definition?

Well, obviously, because it’s his desire as a social conservative that the people of California not be able to avail themselves of abortions.First regarding, “banning abortion”, I didn’t mean that specific language.A bill redefining when life begins doesn’t address abortion, but it affects it indirectly And I know he never promoted a bill that sought to regulate abortion directly in any way.

I know the manner in which laws prohibiting a certain act or undertaking, or the possession or sale of some item are drafted.Second, I’ll acquiesce and say that RP’s promotion of those bills are not one of his prouder moments.But I still believe that above everything, his integrity is the most important value to him.As such, i he promoted a bill redefining when life begins, and not abortion itself, avoiding in form if not substance, a patent legislation of his personal morality, and ; ii probably had the requisite numbers of those in his Texas district in favor of such a bill as he’d want to be sure he was acting on behalf of those who put him in office.

As I suggested, maybe he did these things so he could sleep at night But waaaiiit just a bit on your conclusion that he’s a social conservative.He may have his view on pro-life He had a “hands off” policy on gay marriage which is the current working policy and he wanted to end the war on drugs.Do you know of other social issues in which his leaning was something other than his libertarian ideology? The effect is obviously direct, and obviously the intent of the legislation.

No one cares about the definition of the “beginning of life” except those opposed to abortion.I mean except for the bills I keep showing you.So, again, you’re completely mistaken – Paul has , on regular occasions, supported and voted for bills that directly prohibit abortions at the Federal level.I don’t know what else I have to show you to prove to you that this is not an issue that Paul “leaves to the states.

Well, sure.Uniquely, he’s the only southern conservative Republican trying to hoodwink you into thinking he’s some kind of Republi-tarian who opposes abortion but won’t vote on that basis.The problem I’m trying to get across to you is, all the evidence you have from that comes from Ron Paul telling you it’s true.

But it isn’t.He just wants you to think that.Only the second of those is true.From everything you’ve told me and that I’ve read today, I am more acutely aware of Ron Paul’s politics as a representative.I’m disappointed in Paul and that he would sponsor the Marriage Protection Act — an Act that would have prevented federal courts from interpreting DOMA before it was struck down.I give you credit for enlightening me I sincerely mean that.

Notwithstanding all of that, when you balance out the bad from the good, there was still no better candidate than him in I voted for Obama, and he lied about virtually everything he campaigned for transparency, whistleblowers, slashing military budget, etc.Paul had the Republican nomination stolen from him, as a follower I saw every media outlet ignore him, and the Establishment Republican party insert Mitt Romney.

I couldn’t stand Romney, but Obama had himself only given lip service to everything he supposedly was for.I didn’t vote in I couldn’t.Ron Paul is not relevant any more, and I suppose the only reason I put effort into defending him today though I was wrong about some things is because I brought him up above as a viable candidate for president in I’ll admit he’s not as libertarian as he professes, and he is conservative on some social issues, but despite that, he was better than any Republican candidate, and a better candidate than Obama, who had shown for four years that he could do the opposite of what he campaigned for in I mean they’re not.

Not by anything objective we can measure.But the truth is that things are not worse.That’s scientific fact, if you recognize science.

And nothing happens in this subreddit except what conspiracy the rists are always doing, which is attempting to explain the world in some other way than the most obvious – that the world is just what happens when you mix up a lot of basically good but human people and a small number of sociopaths and unevenly distribute them in the very thin layer between rock and space, in the places where it’s not too wet and not too dry.And then it just takes one idiot, or one true villian, to really cock things up.

And the story that the world is controlled by a small number of powerful evil-doers is just that, a story , a story mental children tell themselves because the notion that the world is someone’s evil vision and they themselves are the heroes who will eventually do something about it is still less scarier than the truth that nobody’s really in charge, and this world is what it looks like even when our institutions are run by decent and honest people which, overwhelmingly, they are.

I mean I don’t even think Ron Paul is a bad guy, even after the stuff I’ve said about him; I think he’s just got a very different view of things than I do, or ever will, and even his dishonesty could be explained as the act of a basically good person who believes in something feeling like he’s running out of time to achieve it, and starting to take shortcuts.

None of that’s meant to talk you into support for Obama.It’s meant to talk you out of pinning all your hopes on the next charismatic leader.

Because the world isn’t helped by leaders.Believe it or not, it’s helped by committees.It’s not just charisma that draws me.I was out of college in the early s, and things weren’t bad.I went to law school and became an attorney, and made a good amount of money and then invested in commercial real estate.

I did well, sold some but wasn’t on top of everything in the mortgage market have you seen “The Big Short”? I’m working my way back, but a lot has changed since I graduated law school.During the s while in law school the law and the constitution were still applicable.I may be an atheist, but I believed in a certain level of predictable stability with the rules of government, and the rules that I expected the government to heed.

We as a nation were maybe two trillion in debt in I can’t even remember.As I said above, when Bush was running I was apolitical.

After the Patriot Act, and Iraq..Then Obama and his crushing of whistleblowers, and invoking state secrets bullshit.It’s wrong.I did take solace in Obama’s words in Then in , the same with Ron Paul.But remember above where I compared them? I said that Obama’s campaign had similar promises as Ron Paul? That’s because they did And I liked what they both said when they did because I wanted the rules back in place.Back as they were when the government was worried about getting caught surveilling you without a proper warrant, back when there was fucking due process.

It’s gotten dramatically worse.I mean fuck, there may be some inchoate whiny people in this sub, but I am not whining because I can’t make sense out of disorder.I am upset because I witnessed the semblence of order we once had.

Go explore for yourself.I often tell people to download or cue up David Fincher’s Se7en.Then after Morgan Freeman’s character suggests this, watch Brad Pitt’s character’s reaction.He goes off on him for even suggesting they do something like that.Watch that scene today and it seems quaint, like the “olden days”, but it was 20 years ago! If you think the world under a handful of sociopaths in is not much different than the same world under a different handful of sociopaths now, you are blind.

It’s night and day.You are incredibly smug.You have intelligence, but not the wisdom You profess fact and elucidate your interpretations of situations or this sub as if you were a sage, complete with vein of self-proclaimed omniscience But to be truly smart is to realize you know nothing.Ok, so I did review the sanctity of life acts.And it doesn’t speak to abortion, but it does attempt to redefine legal personhood, which then would be protected simply by federal murder statutes which as an aside, aren’t exactly constitutional either, but no one complains I do vaguely remember these.

While I am not in favor of them, he is a representative.I would hope that he had the support of his constituents at least.But the difference is, and my apologies because I wasn’t thinking this through because there is a difference.

Just like I said above where he believes that only Congress is authorized to declare war, he was a strong proponent of the separation of powers.You can believe what you want, but the executive branch—at least constitutionally defined—is not the legislative branch.The executive branch only has a say in the legislative process through his veto power What I forgot to consider above was that he was a representative on one hand, and drafting and passing laws pursuant to the will of his constituents is the job of the House.

I shouldn’t second guess you, but I’m going to predict that you will say that he’d somehow steamroll his “sanctity of life” bill through Congress as president.But how? It never got passed when he was a representative, so how would he possibly get it passed as president, especially when he is such a strict constitutionalist?

So, I was wrongfully invoking hyperbole above because he was pushing a bill that redefined when life began, which obviously then would make the fetus protected as a person.So you were essentially right.I am pro-choice and would have been upset if those bills passed But had he become president, he had stated that his priorities His followers would have been livid if, as president, he somehow tried to backdoor through Congress a law that nullified Roe.

Because doing something like that goes against everything he stands for But I apologize for not recalling those “sanctity of life” bills, and for drawing this discussion out further than necessary.

I mean, ok, but Ron Paul is was a legislator in the legislative branch.So I don’t see the relevance of this.Sorry, I’m not speaking to this point at all.

It’s not relevant what he would do in an office he’ll never hold.It’s sufficient to demonstrate the phoniness of his “libertarianism” merely by demonstrating what he did do as a sitting US Representative – attempt to legislate his socially conservative views on every American, consistently, every year he served in the House.Although, you kept using the phrase “banning abortion”, and I knew of no bills that had any such language.No well, few if any bill that bans something uses the phrase “X is now banned.

Certainly a law that has the effect of it being unlawful to obtain an abortion is a law that can be described as “banning abortion.As you say, the laws were proposed as the Sanctity of Life acts.In your view, is it consistent with libertarianism for Congress to take an official stance, and enforce by law, what Americans are to hold sacred?

I don’t see how it can be, or how that bill can be viewed as anything but an attempt by Ron Paul to hold all Americans since it would apply anywhere within the borders of the US to his own individual notion of religious sanctity.But he doesn’t stand for it.That’s my point.We can judge what he stands for by his activity as a legislator rather than by what he merely pays lip service to.

And that activity as a legislator betrays him as someone who believes the Federal government is a tool to enforce his social views on Americans.

Anything he says he believes about Constitutional limits on Federal power is merely an attempt to mislead people and gain their support.That’s why I’m telling you, ignore what he says he believes about Federal power and the libertarian view, and look at what he acts like he believes about Federal power.Even if you don’t think abortion itself a big deal the definition of the liberty in a 14th Amendment context is or should be , which is where the Constitutional issue stems from.

If a person thinks abortion is murder, fine.But who are they to judge? Coveting their neighbor’s wife, stealing, etc.Why do they get to judge other people? It’s bullshit.I don’t get this.When you think about actual murder, callous people ending the lives of others for a bit of money or some other convenience, do you think “oh well, who am I to judge, I steal a candy bar once in a while” or do you think that should be illegal? Even for Christians the idea that the slightest thing is exactly as bad as murdering children is not remotely ubiquitous, in Catholicism for example they have “mortal” and “venial” sins where something like being jealous of your neighbors wife is forgivable but murdering a child is a ticket straight to hell.

For any reasonable Christian it’s not about judging others, it’s about protecting the children from death.Some believe they have to grow to the age of reason and choose Christianity to get to go to heaven, for example.Those souls are being damned for eternity to purgatory or worse by the people committing the abortions, they are trying to save those people not judge the murderers.

Trying to shame them is mainly a tactic to try to make people stop aborting by overwhelming them with guilt before they do it.The arguments against abortion are more complicated and important than you give them credit for here.The issues at stake are deeply significant, we are talking about the right to have control over ones own body, and the body is an integral component of the self.

A person forced to carry a pregnancy is very literally a slave.Im always divided on the abortion issue.It’s interesting you say that “a person forced to carry a pregnancy is very literally a slave”.

What always boggles my mind is, what is the difference between a fetus and a kid? I guess she could give it up for adoption right?

It’s not like we would let the mother kill the kid, or just completely neglect the born child.And yet, by law she literally has to do that or she will go to jail if the kid dies.

Is that not a similar type of “slavery”? As you said adoption is an option.This is essential to the idea of slavery because everything else you said is negated by adoption.You don’t have to force them to not neglect because they have options to not care for the child at all.

That is a legitimate way to completely renounce all responsibility for the child’s welfare.There is no equivalency to that while pregnant, except of course abortion.You are not a slave if you can quit and walk away.That is adoption.But if once pregnant you have to carry to term, and brave the inherent risk of death or debilitation, “quitting” the responsibility is not possible, hence slavery.

The problem is that the same people opposing abortion are also the same ones who disapprove of welfare systems that help children who are already born.If they care so much about unborn children why do they not care much about certain sects of born children? They are also the same people who tend to be pro-gun, pro-military, pro police and pro capital punishment whom also harm and often kill people.

There is no logic behind any of the assertions, only sports team programming of wedge issues by laughing elites.Abortion isn’t the issue, I could have chosen any topic, it’s labeling the things people care about as inconsequential that I took issue with.I’ll continue with it as an example though.Something isn’t going to seem like a wedge issue if it directly affects your life.

Now, it’s easy to look at it from an outside perspective and think “Why are we still talking about this? There are REAL problems to deal with! My point is, most issues have actual people within them who are going to be affected by the outcome.This is what needs to get said.Many people just parrot what the leaders of their group says in order to feel a part of a group.

Considering they fancy themselves libertarians, they should have some empathy for protecting body autonomy.People who are against abortion never question the concept of children as essential property of their parents, yet they think a cluster of cells’ right to autonomy trumps the fullly functional being who will have legal power over the cells-cum-human for 18 years.

My only real point being that Tea Partiers are slightly above retarded, brainwashed, and not at all libertarian except when it comes to freedom of racist speech.What bait? I’m not trying to be cryptic.Whether something is ‘consequential’ is pretty subjective depending on how you look at it.That’s my only point.If someone is passionate about an issue telling them it’s inconsequential isn’t going to be any more effective at unifying people than engaging them in an argument.

I’m not just pro-choice.I’m pro-abortion all the time.Sterilize these fucking morons, there’s too many people here already, not to even get started on immigration.Fuck em all.I’m for post-natal abortion.How about just bathrooms, with full walls and doors that lock.

It won’t matter who opens the door.Just remember to put the damn seat back down.Why is it our responsibility to both lift and lower the seat.If it’s so easy for us to lower the seat why isn’t it so easy for you all.Why not look at it as a positive the seat was raised in the first place instead of having someone piss or dribble on the seat that you are going to sit on in the first place.Because you too, really want to be polite, and leave things as good as or better than you found them.

I’m sick of this argument about toilets.I don’t get up in arms when i need to reach down and lift a up a seat in order to piss.Nor do i care when i have to put the seat down for a shit.Jesus fuck it’s a god damn toilet.

Leaving a seat up or down does fuck all good if the next person needs it the opposite that it was left.That’s why it’s got a good damn option on it.So that if you don’t like the way it is you may adjust it.Jesus fuck toilets are the dumbest thing to argue about making the world a better place.I seriously hope that line was a joke.I’m with you.I don’t give two shits if the seat is up or down or if the toilet paper is hung front or back or if there is a member of the opposite sex in there or if the door has gaps in it.

I just want to bloody well relieve myself.The clear option is to have no seat and simply a hole in the ground.If the seat causes such division then clearly the problem is the seat and not the people.

Do you like it when you have to poop and you go in half asleep or distracted and sit down, only to realize the seat is up and your ass is in toilet water? No one does.Be polite and close the entire lid as well.Then we are all expected to put the seat and lid down, problem solved.I also don’t like when I’m half asleep and go to take a piss and it hits the lid and sprays all over my feet so no you lose everyone should be responsible for putting the seat how they want it before using the bathroom period.

I just look at the toilet beforehand and put the seat down if it was left up, why do females act entitled to the seat being down at all times.These days we’re even divided further.The powers that be do not want us to agree and get along, if that happened we’d have to take a serious look at them.

Your reply shows how bad you missed the point.None of this is worth any breath.We need to take on evil.Edit: already getting the downvotes, you stupid religious fucks, you really think your ‘god’ is anything but an illusion designed to keep you under control and following the rules the elites set to keep you in line for centuries? The fucking commandments are about listening to “authority” Wake the fuck up.Tolerance does not equal acceptance.But you’re right, your Utopia will be different than mine.

Guess we just have to find one that works best for the individual! The same people who infiltrated and ended the Native American rights movements Red Army during the 60’s were the Exact same people who infiltrated, split up, and ended the Black Panther Party in the early 70’s.

We must be weary of the CIA and their operatives.Sean Hannity had a guest host on recently who interviewed one of his buddies at DHS.He said explicitly that their primary mission was infiltrating and disrupting movements.I don’t doubt that at all.I remember liking him, and then catching onto the pattern He takes the side that I think the CIA would take, on almost every issue.Trust me, there’s enough people willing to join the cause from all over the world.Our next step is getting us all together with one plan, a good plan; to actually do something about it.

That in my opinion is the biggest and hardest part to overthrow the corrupt in charge.Where and how do we all come together, and what is the plan? It’s going to start online, it’s the easiest and best way to communicate as of right now.I agree however the sub would need to be private imo.An open forum would invite infiltrators, shills, and provocateurs undermining any movement before it began.Yeah, it will be private.I’m in the process of starting one, if you want to help let me know.I don’t know what I’m doing.

Keep the ball rolling it won’t stop.What about a boycott.It would require individual financial sacrifice, but it would be a non violent way to send a strong message.I see it happening like this: Submit a list of grievances with a due date, if the grievances are not remedied in time we stop going to work and stop unnecessary purchases; basically stop participating economically.The corporations and govt would have a shit fit due to the lack of revenue.

The grievances could include the elimination of the lobby, reversing citizens united, setting term limits for politicians and campaign finance reform.The best part is, we can do this from home.Non participation.The problem with this is the elite has us right where they want us.Most of us who are bothered by the system are the ones being screwed, so we live by paycheck.

We stop going to work we have no money to support our families with a home and food.A lot of these people rely on huge cooperations because its generally cheaper to buy essentials and food compared to independent businesses.

I would be surprised if there wasn’t some kind of authority watching over this entire discussion like a group of headhunters, looking for the strongest potential warrior to make an example out of.Can’t even get people to agree to disagree Everything is a personal war now, it’s surreal.And the powers that be love it that way.

Easy to rule over absolute chaos, as long as instant gratification for the masses is satiated.Sooo let’s indigogo our militia to get thousands of rifles and rocket launchers, fly Snowden out here, break out every prisoner from prison in Cali and setup base inbetween the border of Mexico, and surround ourselves by EMP weapons.

Central HQ will be led by Snowden and our attacks will be nonviolent hacking into all systems as well as automated MITM data obfuscation rendering the web useless unless we explicitly grant the data right of passage.We will steal NSA tapping devices and extract all the gold to forge a crown for Snowden to wear atop his rack mounted throne with an Occulus rift when we drop to defcon 1.It seems like that is one thing which pretty much everyone can agree one.

We can go back to in-fighting once the threat to everyone is dealt with.It sounds so simple but all we really need to do is put our differences aside, our different beliefs, and just come together for the common goal that we are human and we want freedom.

Good luck getting anyone to belive half of this stuff, im not saying its not true, but making people believe all this is next to impossible.I propose that no political party has the ideal solution.Sometimes the best solution might be Republican.Other problems might best be solved with a Socialist solution.

Others with a Democratic one.We need to ditch the black and white thinking patterns we’ve been trapped in and realize that problems are complex and solutions must be equally so.

There needs to be a public speaker for the cause, one that the people who see this corrupt change in society can get behind, who isn’t trying to run for president.They have made a damn good job of making sure that is extremely difficult to do, but it can be done!

I was sarcastically talking about the left’s way of unifying us by calling all white people racists.We all need to kongregate and come up with a coalition that spreads it’s influence to the people.Start with local communities and spread outwards.Raise our children better and retake our education institutions.

Plant seeds of change and give back to the those that have worked too hard.That is why we do not go through the traditional social structure.The internet is where the revolution will be televised because it is harder to control than ever.

We need a website in which we can share our ideas intelligently and uncensored.We’ve seen it before in Egypt with the use of facebook.This corruption though, it’s not just American.It’s a global crisis.Let’s be honest, reddit is great as sort of humanity’s working memory, but we need version 2.

We need more organization.We need more focus.We ALL need to be able to see the issues that truly matter.I’m building such a website, but I can’t share it with you yet.Whether I build it or not though, it will be built, and we will come together outside of our governments awake.

Just remember that forgiveness and love are your two greatest weapons.They are truth serums.Through love and forgiveness we will rise together like bread.Violence only breeds violence.We’ve seen it over and over.We all know it in our hearts.Love your enemy and they will become your friend! Not going to happen anytime soon.The economic climate and social structure has led to a deeply divided populace and those two things change very slowly.

Obviously two people at complete odds in their values cannot work together.The best thing would be to simply separate into two or more nations, divide the US into various states and let people choose where they want to go.

I’m not from the US, but can’t you found a party which’s main goal is to reform the government so it becomes a government for the people? One prime point should be that a rich should not be able to have more decisive power in the legislative than than a poor one.That’ll be impossible.All sorts of political groups are against the US government.On this sub alone, nevermind the whole country, I see nationalist socialists and fascists getting into arguments with communists.

I see Libertarians and liberals fight with anarchists and conservatives.It goes on and on.I personally have a problem with some parts of this sub.There is a lot of good content it’ll be even better when this fucking election is over , but a lot of poorly sourced theories created by total tinfoil hatters, racists, and others who seek to undermine this community with their outrageous, deliberately absurd ideas to discredit the good things on this sub.

It’s a huge problem.We need to address that and do something about it.First thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.It’s gonna be hard to get all the thug black folk to not throw rocks and commit crimes during any movements to come.There were many addresses of people buying power in the last leak, should be pretty easy to do.

Do you really think that there are only black people being thugs? FFS look at that guy that suckerpunched an old woman at a Trump rally.Thugs come in all colors.Others do it too!

I could probably find a video of a fucking raccoon throwing rocks at a window.But blacks cause the majority of all crime in this country and have absolutely no desire to better their country since they’re all drug dealers anyway.I don’t hate the color of their skin, I hate what they’ve done to this country.If they all were responsible and fucking paid attention to what’s going wrong and actually tried to better themselves instead of sitting back and talking about how hard “life on the streets” is then this country would be doing a lot better.

Okay you’re right, everyone is exactly the same and it’s impossible that one race can continue to do bad things because we live in a politically correct society now! I always forget how easy it is to just close your eyes and tell yourself that facts are irrelevant if they separate a race from the others.

Life is good now : carry on! You are expressing yourself, freely.You have every right to do so.You speak with a grain of truth, even.You Americans don’t know how lucky you are with that second amendment.Us Dutch folks got disarmed after the war, and we’re just sitting ducks for the Them right now.

But I understand that this is also a frightening prospect, too.Many would die, many good people on both sides.I think it is of the utmost importance to get the good people on their side to defect..There are many soldiers and police men who might sympathise more with the good cause than with the plutocrats living in theyr lofty palaces.

The combined efforts of the U.Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corp will never be overthrown by a bunch of people with assault rifles.So the American people are equally “sitting ducks”.But what if the soldiers side with the people with rifles?

I think it can be possible, and to make it possible people need to be awoken.Nothing will happen until people start going without food, water, and internet.Not until that point.We have a citizen army, if the cause is universal and clearly outlined I would call it realistically possible.Think of how brainwashed the average person is in this country.Now insert them into a rah rah totalitarian institution that the ignorant praise them for being in and cultivates the idea that any that don’t support the government is un-american.

The average soldier that isn’t sent to his home town would fire on you no problem.You are a rebel and a threat to the american way of life after all, a home grown terrorist.

Exactly right.Dehumanize the enemy by making them “the other”.The word terrorist does a great job of that.The idea that soldiers would all defect and if I’m not mistaken they would face death for doing so if not a very long prison sentence instead of firing on their countrymen is laughably naive.

It’s never going to be “the American public is in an uprising! Kill them all! Once enough of these groups are absolutely decimated the motivated strength to unify more groups will be eviscerated.Anyone who thinks they’re going to “take their country back” by stockpiling arms to use against the US military is a fucking idiot.Look at the taliban, look at the Vietcong.Seeing your neighbors die is a powerful motivator.Drag it on long enough and I believe the will of the military would break first.

I never said all will to fight, I said the motivated strength to unify these groups into a single powerful and unified movement.The unity is what will be destroyed, and small groups fighting their own battles is completely worthless of the goal is to stop the government or the military.While people often talk about how soldiers are taught to protect the constitution I really think they’re taught to follow orders and not ask questions.

Do you know any soldiers? It doesn’t matter what the army teaches them they will mostly side with the people.Soldiers fired on and killed four innocent unarmed people for protesting against their corrupt government and a war America should never have been involved in.So the soldiers are trained to, and usually do, side with their masters.I can’t think of anytime in American history where soldiers sided with the people over the government.

Personally I’d see that as rebeling against the British government.There might have been other times but I can’t think of any.Completely different.Multiple generations lived in America apart from normal British society so that they felt as British as you or I feel British.They were just fighting a foreign country that had control over them.It didn’t feel like a civil war.

Some might but I believe the vast majority would side with the government.I mean these are the people that volunteered to go to war and protect the U.Idk where you are from but from my anecdotal experience, the people in the military that I know would not fire on us civilians.I think it all depends on how the conflict starts.

If the choice is either follow orders or die.It’s hard to say how many would risk defecting.Worked pretty well for the Nazis.They convinced their soldiers to kill quite a few of their own.Lets theorycraft a little.Les play upon the assumption that all of these conspiracys are correct and the government is in a worst case state.So folks take to the streets with their guns against the government.

Media follows suit of the most part.No one likes a riot except folks already rioting.Since we’ve already brought guns into the mix we can kind of assume the police will assume you intend on using them presumably on the government officials you’re targeting.

Assuming groups get to government buildings they’d either take hostages or shooting folks deemed guilty or did you think civil war would be bloodless.Suffice to say this will be covered in great detail by the media.Not too many folks get warm fuzzy feelings about watching old people held at gunpoint or worse.From that point on it would go poorly for the rebels.

A few pointless cogs in the machine get shot, statues unveiled a while later.No major players would get killed because..I have no hope soldiers won’t kill us.They’ve been brainwashed to kill terrorists so their commanders will tell them they are only attacking terrorists and then their brain shuts off.Tell that to the Viet Cong.The man in the black pajamas devastated our armed forces with small arms and mortars.I’m not talking about the north Vietnamese army.

I’m talking about the Viet Cong.Poor farmers who used small arms, booby traps, the cover of darkness to do hit and run guerilla tactics, and psychological warfare against our troops.Those pheasants weren’t flying around in jets and using tanks.They were sneaky like a ghost in the night and wreaked havoc on our troops.They wanted to be left the fuck alone.They were sick of French rule and viewed the invasion of American forces as just “more of the same”.

We , the common man, might align with those ideals, but so would any U.They did not understand the point of the war and many thought that Johnson, Nixon, “Democracy”, “The Domino Theory” etc.

They were more concerned with getting out of Vietnam alive than they were progressing Democratic ideals throughout Vietnam.It sheds some brilliant light on the psyche of the American soldier in Vietnam.Also, where do you think they got the education on how to use them? Vietnam was a proxy war in its finest form.Akoustis April Presentation That means systems using Akoustis’ XBAW filters can achieve significantly higher signal – to-noise ratios and, as a result, deliver superior quality communications Seeking Alpha.

S’mores and cider to be served.Bring a blanket and a flashlight.Masks are required and social distancing will be maintained.When: Oct.Where: Mitchell Park Courtyard, Palo Alto Weekly.The Eagle.I’ve chosen dropbox because it is one of my favorite apps as there are several apps on the app store that offer cloud service much cheaper than dropbox, but there is the design of the app that holds its users like me for using it.

For only the second time in the world, doctors at the University of Chicago Medicine Comer Children’s Hospital and the Department of Neurosurgery used a minimally invasive surgery to disconnect.

We provide the official link and a number of helpful pages for the login above.They are reliable sites collected by LoginNote.Please check it thoroughly! It is certain that your login experience is very valuable for other users.We will really appreciate if you can share it with us.Please check it.

For each search from the user, besides the login link, we also provide relevant information such as register guiding, requirements, and accounts.Sure, you can.Roblox catalog script – Pastebin.Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time.Login Sign up.

Roblox catalog script.Jan 3rd, Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features! Visit site.Any Catalog Item – Pastebin.Jan 29th, Sign Up , it unlocks many cool features! Catalog Heaven Gui – Pastebin.Jul 26th, Free Catalog – Pastebin.Sep 8th, Free Catalog Items – Pastebin.API tools faq.Free Catalog Items.Nov 26th, Pastebin pastebin.Pastebin Login Sign up.Feb 2nd, : Never: 1, None – Public Pastes.Creative Bloomers Fandom.Roblox ca.Roblox soulshatters script pastebin Feb 21, Discover the best free exploits in ROBLOX, SK8R is currently the best new model 3 robux items all new toyota models alto Roblox get any item from the catalog?

Feb 21, Pastebin.Hat Hub – Rscripts the perfect place for the best Roblox Legends Of Speed Auto-Farm.Apr 24, Saber Simulator Auto Farm.Apr 18, FE Car Script – Rscripts the perfect place for the best Pretty fun FE script! Allows you to drive a Car with or without the Car accessory.Made by Lozarth, enjoy! Why does my download keeps getting deleted or wont download at all? If you are unable to download the.

A very epic script, can move all objects Unanchored in all games.By admin, 3 months.Catalog heaven script – millionaireornothing.Odst orbital drop shock troopers sc.Roblox Catalog Script Daily Catalog trend daily-catalog.It is obtainable in the Celebrity Collection Series 3.As of December 26, it has been favorited times.Aimbot script rb world 2 pastebin.Works on all the devices january duration.Roblox catalogue hack.Dec 17th, By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.

Any gamepass for free script leaked – Club Dark Roblox Exploit new clubdark.If it doesn’t work, leave the game and try again, I tried just one time and this worked.It appears it worked.User scripts for roblox.Author roblox gamer julianpblo Daily installs 3 Total installs 6, Ratings 5 1 3 Created Updated ; Free 10 Million Robux prank! Free store items do not require any Robux to purchase.

Free items are often released as part of a special promotion and sometimes they are only available for a limited time.This page only contains free items that you can get from the catalog.You can also find “free” items on some of our other pages such as Promo Codes, and Creator Challenges.

Health Details: Pastebin.Useful Blogs.This is as fast as opening a new Gmail id; for different brokers; it needs a few days till they do any background investigation on you.Instead of just saving money on it, you will keep your financial assets, such as shares or forex positions, in your account.Opening an account is always free.To learn more about trading accounts, read our article on this topic.

Unless you have a permanent residence in the USA, we recommend finding another broker.To open an account with an online broker, you usually need to provide proof of identity and proof of residence.Ideally, this process is entirely digital.The problem is that some brokers eventually require physical copies of your documents.This is a great broker to start your investment journey.And then, you can attach more supplies to your account, succeeding as you become more encountered in handling your investments.

Each of them has specific needs and characteristics.Most online brokers offer different interpretations based on your identity or experience, the nature of the traded products, the currencies available, and personal investment advice.

Of course, each brokerage company will offer slightly different packages.Unfortunately, Vanguard only offers trading in one currency, the USD.This is important because if you deposit funds in currencies other than the base currency, your money will be converted into USD.To save on exchange fees, you can start a multi-currency bank account.Both Transferwise and Revolut bank accounts give excellent currency exchange rates in many currencies and free or cheap international bank transfers.

It only takes a few minutes to open an account on your phone.The steps of open an vanguard business account The specific process of opening an account in Vanguard may differ slightly from the details here, but it usually involves the following steps: Choose your account Before you submit any of your personal information, make sure you have chosen the correct type of brokerage account for you.Make your choice on the registration page, and then go to the next step.

Add personal info The next move is to go over the essential knowledge inquiry.You will need to provide your name, date of birth, address, nationality, employment, etc.The complexity of this step depends on the broker you choose.

You will also need to answer some security questions to ensure that you are legally allowed to trade and some questions about your trading experience.This could be a passport, an identity card, or a bank statement.Exact requirements vary by broker.Some online brokers will ask you to send physical copies of your documents.

This can significantly delay the account opening process.Seal the deal Once you have made it through essential registration and identification, you will have the opportunity to review the information you have provided and enter into a virtual agreement after agreeing to the terms and conditions of your chosen broker.Fund your account Once your account is verified and opened, you can start trading.At least transfer the deposit, or if there is none, transfer any amount to your broker account and move on!

Now you are an investor! Conclusion So these were the simple steps about opening a vanguard business account.You can open your account easily by following the steps.For further information visit our site.Some so many Windows users have reported problems in getting logging in or creating issues while entering their username or password.

InputBegan:Connect function D if D.

Catalog Script Pastebin​ – properties

  • Maybe in la-la-land, but not in the real world as recorded history has proven over and over again.
  • Catalog GUI Setup
  • This applies to physically, emotionally, or psychologically.
  • But I understand that this is also a frightening prospect, too.
  • Also we need to trust in each other so I’d hope that instead of saying “I just don’t see how they could be right” give them the benefit of the doubt and let them fight their fight.
  • Go explore for yourself.
  • There are studies showing even black cops are more likely to fire their weapons at suspicious looking black males.
  • KeyUp:connect function dr end mouse.

Roblox catalog script – Pastebin.com

What I’m trying to accomplish is to detect when a player has pressed their right mouse button, and through a loop, rotate their character based on the CFrame of the camera until the button is released.

The pipe is in a fixed, horizontal position.In this tutorial i show you how to move a model using primary part, which you can use this to move many parts inside a model This video was requested by one of my builders for Obstacle Island.This is a complete beginner tutorial series that will teach you the fundamentals of Roblox scripting.

UDim2 Nested Loops.Roblox Adopt Me Codes.Most SB’s that Join Us.To create a rotated CFrame at the origin, use: It is worth noting that the rotations are … I have found a pretty easy way to CFrame bricks.Nesting loops allows you to repeat tasks in batches.It drives me crazy and gives me a headache.Help is appriechiated, thank you for your Add Model.Offer gang roblox code id.This is the primary function that should be used to move Model Models via scripting.

More roblox games wiki.About Roblox Position Weld.I’m trying to create a custom vehicle script, and it works for the most part, but when I try to rotate the steering wheels using CFrame, it snaps back to place after an instant because of what I assume to be the weld that’s connected to the immovable axis.Roblox is a global platform that brings people together through play.I love the water effect, and really want to m.Redstone Discussion and Mechanisms.

Forums New posts Search forums.A Part that … Roblox coding is a great way to learn text-based computer programming, and Roblox Studio is a You will learn functions such as Move, Scale, Rotate, and the basics of getting around the Roblox.Anti-aliasing attempts to smooth out jagged lines in a game.In Roblox, your camera has a CFrame with a lookVector and so on.

Angles 0,math.This server is responsible for keeping track of all of the parts and players in the game.The rotation around the up axis increases as you move in the direction your right hands fingers curl ie.While the game itself is free, all players have the option of paying real.

DegVelopment DegVelopment April 17, , pm 2.After the clothes are uploaded, click the settings icon to … free robux.Trying to tween the CFrame of a model? I’m working on my own custom placement system, and I thought it would be nice to have the model smoothly move between points with the mouse.In Roblox, it can apply to 3D objects or 2D objects.

Create variables for the camera and the player that can be used throughout the script.Model Models are moved in … Setting the primary part designates a specific part in the model to serve as a base that you can move around via its CFrame.Roblox makes this smooth automatically.This platform consists of millions of individual games, created by players themselves with the Roblox Studio program.The types of welds, joints, and welding positions used in manual-shielded metal arc welding are very similar to those used in oxygas welding.

Box2 local … How can i move and rotate the cframe a part that is weldcontrained to other parts parts before adding them to the workspace? I dont want a model to appear at 0,0,0 and then teleport to its assigned position.Hey guys! How do you freely move models in Roblox Studio? First, simply click on the Move icon located in the Model tab at the top of the screen.This is a Roblox issue we are unable to fix.

A vector is how we define a coordinate in a 3D world with x, y, and z axises.The W key moves your character forward, or the direction you are currently viewing on your screen.Game Dev Help.Moving Char in World Model.This dosen’t abide by part collision and can cause your model … I’ve recently been working a lot with CFrame mechanics while scripting and I’ve got kind of stuck on this.

Take your game design to the next level, with this complete guide to Roblox coding and scripting! All BaseParts e.My course will teach you how to set up and create your first Roblox game.Use the Rotate tool to rotate an object.Im not sure whats causing this, but im positive it has something to do with this line clone.Roblox Developer Hub Tutorials.Move and Rotate.The following links should help you get started: Roblox Developer Hub.Scripting Challenges.

So first, whenever I equip it while testing, my character teleports to the gun instead of the gun teleporting into my hand.This game has many affiliates, mostly groups which help keep the peace in its 3 main locations, namely The … Roblox, the Lego-like virtual world with blocky landscapes, is adding an option today for its 5 million monthly active players to roam a world with.

CFrame is short for Coordinate Frame that holds the position and rotation vectors.If there are any obstructions where the model is to be moved to, such as Terrain or other BasePart s, then the model will be moved up in the Y direction until there is nothing in the way.

Help and Feedback Scripting Support.Note that rotation is not preserved when moving a model with MoveTo.You can then click somewhere in your scene to place the model.You can weld all of the parts of the model together, and then move any one part using CFrame.Only the administrators of the official Roblox will have this emblem.Set the CFrame on the client.I’m trying to create a custom vehicle script, and it works for the most part, but when I try to rotate the steering wheels using CFrame, it snaps back to place after an instant because of what I assume to be the weld that’s connected to the Roblox Vehicle Simulator Codes For Free Cash July borderpolar.

He was the Creative Director of Roblox from to In studio I place this goal part at the position in which I … Roblox is a massively multiplayer game where players can interact with the place and use the chat interact, the first thing you need to do is know how to move around.You can do that in the Properties window.

So in this case, the part would move halfway to Part2.Before we get into the actual code of the platformer, it is important to understand how Roblox games are structured.Even after using.Roblox is one of the most popular online building games in The Position is part of a CFrame, along with a rotation matrix that defines how the object is oriented.ROBLOX is a great idea – letting kids create their own online worlds that they can share with friends – but is pretty rough around the edges.

The other arrow keys will rotate your screen in their respective directions.Roblox Turrets local – Pastebin.Now, select the brick in Workspace that you wish to CFrame.Before you can access the Character property, you need to get the player’s object.The basic keys that most players use is the WASD system.In a game I’m developing, I found a free model car.Is it possible to CFrame orbit a model so that all the objects in the model move with it?

I am trying to make a planet orbit another planet but the debris on one planet gets left behind and doesn’t follow the planet that is orbiting the MAIN planet.A simple model is created in the Workspace and a loop is started that will rotate the model 10 degrees around the Y axis every 0.The rotation matrix is either the rotation matrix of the user-defined PrimaryPart, or if not specified then a part in the Model chosen by the engine.

And also i have welded 2 hitbox and another vfx mesh with weld constraint so they can turn and move with player all together.Ok, so I’ve started using roblox studio recently, and I’ve gotten the hang of the basics I think This website was created by Roblox members to replace the official forums because Roblox shut them down Join us if you like Thanks for the video, but I know how to make an object move.

You may think you know so much about adopt me.Astronomia coffin dance piano sheets i roblox got talent victory play 7 years on virtual piano.

Selection:Get [1] v.Object Orientation.What’s nice about this approach is that if you transform the PrimaryPart of a Model with these methods, all of the other parts in the Model will also transform to maintain their offset from the PrimaryPart.

If you’re new to scripting, you’ve come to the right place.Returns a Vector3 that is union of the extents of all Parts in the model.Moving around in Roblox is actually very simple.Angles 0,0,math.First moves model by primary part CFrame, second moves model by the center of the model.Opening the game page, click on Play and go into the game.

Essentially our government is illegal.But Ron Paul can’t vote on a bill to ban abortion at the federal level because the federal government has no rights whatsoever as it pertains to abortion—either in the Constitution or derived from common law.What Roe did was in a very vague and convoluted way bring it under substantive due process stating that a woman could have an abortion I think the outcome is good I’m pro-choice , but I think the way it was done was flawed and if you read the opinion, somewhat of a reach.

Compare this to gay marriage I loved it when fucking Bush was saying that he was going to pass a law prohibiting gay marriage That’s ludicrous! The federal government has no power whatsoever to say word one about marriage.What finally happened with gay marriage is what should have happened: the federal government just stopped talking about it, and the states were left to decide on their own.

Historically, things like marriage and family have always been governed by reach individual state it’s how most laws should be It’s like pot laws now So Ron Paul was not voting to “ban abortion” in any way.He was however trying to proceed the same way that Gay Marriage ultimately resolved itself: take federal hands off of it, let the states decide.But then of course liberals heard this and immediately thought that every woman was going to be forced to go back to coat hanger abortions in alleyways.

But in or in other words in our more enlightened era today this would not happen.But they would not last.Public policy and common sense would overrule the moronic religious right in time.

Look, I mean, you can look up his record yourself – he regularly voted for bills that would have made abortion illegal at the Federal level, by finding for fetuses a Federal right not to be aborted.He absolutely was voting to ban abortion at the Federal level, which indicates he absolutely believed the Federal government had the Constitutional authority to do so.Look, you said yourself you don’t know what he voted for.Why don’t you educate yourself on what Ron Paul does, instead of what he says?

The theories of government by which he actually tries to govern, instead of what he purports to govern by? I’d be happy to.He has a huge congressional record and I don’t even know what years or the name of the bill..I’m only saying that until Roe there was no way the federal government could do anything regarding abortion.

With Roe they used medical necessity and legal gymnastics to fit it into a substantive due process right.I’ll concede that RP might have been voting to simply remove abortion from the purview of the federal government.If George Bush had brought a Supreme Court Case to place all marriage under the domain of the federal government which would then allow Congress to pass a law prohibiting gay marriage , it would be the same as someone voting on a bill which removed marriage from being under the authority of the federal government I’m saying it’s a different goal.

Voting to take abortion out of the hands of the federal government so the federal government would have no authority over it is not the same as “banning it”, and banning then would apply to the entire country.The drug laws ban “drugs” at the federal level, so no matter what the states have as their drug laws, the federal laws control and they are illegal.So if RP was voting to create a law that banned abortion as a federal statute , it would apply to every state, and that would have been a huge issue that would have been brought up every time he sat down for any interview RP was far more of a “no law” or “less law” kind of guy as opposed to more laws.

So I could see him voting for removing all laws having to do with abortion at the federal level All of that is fully in the public record, and I definitely linked it to you as well.You can read the text and explanation of the bills Ron Paul submitted to Congress.But you’re mistaken.

For instance, the Federal government could have passed a constitutional amendment banning abortion throughout the country, which could then be ratified by a majority of the states, thereby banning abortion in all of them.That’s the most extreme example – what Ron Paul actually tried to do was backdoor-ban it at the Federal level by finding a constitutional right of individual fetuses not to be aborted, which would have the same effect, because the states cannot restrict your Federal constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment.

I don’t understand what you think you’re “conceding” there.I mean I’m directly telling you that’s not the case.Ron Paul’s proposed legislation would not have removed abortion from the purview of the Federal government; it would have banned abortion by requiring the Federal government to prosecute any abortion as the murder of a US citizen.

Voting to take abortion out of the hands of the federal government so the federal government would have no authority over it is not the same as “banning it”.Yes, I get that.But that’s not what Ron Paul ever attempted to do.What he repeatedly voted for was a ban on abortion that applied universally within the borders of the United States, and which would have pre-empted state authority of the issue altogether, by the supremacy clause.Well, unless people accepted his lip service at face value instead of looking into his record.

You know, like you did.I’ll look it up But if this was actually what he was trying to do, then fuck If he was actually drafting the bills you speak of, then he was one of the most hypocritical men who has ran for president in the past fifteen years.I realize I don’t know the man personally, so I can’t claim to know his true intentions But I’ve looked at parts of his voting record and never saw anything like this but you can’t always tell by names of bills.

But if he really was engineering an end around to Roe and such endeavors were motivated purely on his personal beliefs then these actions would stand in diametric opposition to his oft-stated philosophy of government: that representatives act on behalf of their constituents, and the federal government should act within the parameters of the Constitution: echoed in his views to end the drug war or require that Congress declare war, etc.

In other words, the federal laws and executive power must fall within specifically enumerated authority granted by the Constitution.This is like telling me that the Beatles were a boy band manufactured by EMI and Capital records, with all their songs written by a team of songwriters headed by Neil Diamond and Glen Cambell.How is that in any way newsworthy? I think you’re severely underestimating how common the knowledge is that Ron Paul’s libertarianism is a total hypocritical sham.

A bill that redefines personhood to conception, has at its core a philosophical debate and not Legal one.I don’t agree with it, but I can see how he could reconcile such a bill with his views as a libertarian.Does that “sanctity of life” bill sound authoritarian to you? It’s simply redefining when life starts.Through that redefinition, I acknowledge there would be secondary effects, but I don’t think it makes his “libertarianism” a sham.

I’d have to read the entire bill, but my guess is that it was a way for him to implement his pro-life views but allow him to sleep at night.Further, the pro-life perspective, though it’s inherently flawed, is rooted in that person who subscribes to pro-life believing that, through some kind of imaginary subjugation they are the voice of the fetus, so they believe that pro-choice rights infringe on them.

I agree it’s not a legal argument, and I disagree with it entirely, yet I still empathize or at least try to with the way they feel.

It’s the way I’d want to be treated.Sure, but for the explicit and sole purpose of banning abortion.It wouldn’t apply to, say, calculating your age for any legal purpose – your legal age wouldn’t be advanced 9 months to account for the extra time, retroactively, that you had been a person.That indicates that this is just Ron Paul reasoning backwards from the outcome he’d like – a total ban on abortion within the borders of the United States.

I mean it does – what’s libertarian , explicitly, about the Federal government determining on behalf of the states when life begins? If the people of California desire to affirm that life begins at birth, for what reason does Ron Paul override that view with his own more restrictive definition?

Well, obviously, because it’s his desire as a social conservative that the people of California not be able to avail themselves of abortions.First regarding, “banning abortion”, I didn’t mean that specific language.A bill redefining when life begins doesn’t address abortion, but it affects it indirectly And I know he never promoted a bill that sought to regulate abortion directly in any way.I know the manner in which laws prohibiting a certain act or undertaking, or the possession or sale of some item are drafted.

Second, I’ll acquiesce and say that RP’s promotion of those bills are not one of his prouder moments.But I still believe that above everything, his integrity is the most important value to him.As such, i he promoted a bill redefining when life begins, and not abortion itself, avoiding in form if not substance, a patent legislation of his personal morality, and ; ii probably had the requisite numbers of those in his Texas district in favor of such a bill as he’d want to be sure he was acting on behalf of those who put him in office.

As I suggested, maybe he did these things so he could sleep at night But waaaiiit just a bit on your conclusion that he’s a social conservative.He may have his view on pro-life He had a “hands off” policy on gay marriage which is the current working policy and he wanted to end the war on drugs.Do you know of other social issues in which his leaning was something other than his libertarian ideology? The effect is obviously direct, and obviously the intent of the legislation.

No one cares about the definition of the “beginning of life” except those opposed to abortion.I mean except for the bills I keep showing you.So, again, you’re completely mistaken – Paul has , on regular occasions, supported and voted for bills that directly prohibit abortions at the Federal level.

I don’t know what else I have to show you to prove to you that this is not an issue that Paul “leaves to the states.Well, sure.Uniquely, he’s the only southern conservative Republican trying to hoodwink you into thinking he’s some kind of Republi-tarian who opposes abortion but won’t vote on that basis.

The problem I’m trying to get across to you is, all the evidence you have from that comes from Ron Paul telling you it’s true.But it isn’t.He just wants you to think that.Only the second of those is true.From everything you’ve told me and that I’ve read today, I am more acutely aware of Ron Paul’s politics as a representative.I’m disappointed in Paul and that he would sponsor the Marriage Protection Act — an Act that would have prevented federal courts from interpreting DOMA before it was struck down.

I give you credit for enlightening me I sincerely mean that.Notwithstanding all of that, when you balance out the bad from the good, there was still no better candidate than him in I voted for Obama, and he lied about virtually everything he campaigned for transparency, whistleblowers, slashing military budget, etc.Paul had the Republican nomination stolen from him, as a follower I saw every media outlet ignore him, and the Establishment Republican party insert Mitt Romney.

I couldn’t stand Romney, but Obama had himself only given lip service to everything he supposedly was for.I didn’t vote in I couldn’t.Ron Paul is not relevant any more, and I suppose the only reason I put effort into defending him today though I was wrong about some things is because I brought him up above as a viable candidate for president in I’ll admit he’s not as libertarian as he professes, and he is conservative on some social issues, but despite that, he was better than any Republican candidate, and a better candidate than Obama, who had shown for four years that he could do the opposite of what he campaigned for in I mean they’re not.

Not by anything objective we can measure.But the truth is that things are not worse.That’s scientific fact, if you recognize science.

And nothing happens in this subreddit except what conspiracy the rists are always doing, which is attempting to explain the world in some other way than the most obvious – that the world is just what happens when you mix up a lot of basically good but human people and a small number of sociopaths and unevenly distribute them in the very thin layer between rock and space, in the places where it’s not too wet and not too dry.

And then it just takes one idiot, or one true villian, to really cock things up.And the story that the world is controlled by a small number of powerful evil-doers is just that, a story , a story mental children tell themselves because the notion that the world is someone’s evil vision and they themselves are the heroes who will eventually do something about it is still less scarier than the truth that nobody’s really in charge, and this world is what it looks like even when our institutions are run by decent and honest people which, overwhelmingly, they are.

I mean I don’t even think Ron Paul is a bad guy, even after the stuff I’ve said about him; I think he’s just got a very different view of things than I do, or ever will, and even his dishonesty could be explained as the act of a basically good person who believes in something feeling like he’s running out of time to achieve it, and starting to take shortcuts.None of that’s meant to talk you into support for Obama.It’s meant to talk you out of pinning all your hopes on the next charismatic leader.

Because the world isn’t helped by leaders.Believe it or not, it’s helped by committees.It’s not just charisma that draws me.I was out of college in the early s, and things weren’t bad.I went to law school and became an attorney, and made a good amount of money and then invested in commercial real estate.I did well, sold some but wasn’t on top of everything in the mortgage market have you seen “The Big Short”?

I’m working my way back, but a lot has changed since I graduated law school.During the s while in law school the law and the constitution were still applicable.I may be an atheist, but I believed in a certain level of predictable stability with the rules of government, and the rules that I expected the government to heed.

We as a nation were maybe two trillion in debt in I can’t even remember.As I said above, when Bush was running I was apolitical.After the Patriot Act, and Iraq..Then Obama and his crushing of whistleblowers, and invoking state secrets bullshit.It’s wrong.I did take solace in Obama’s words in Then in , the same with Ron Paul.

But remember above where I compared them? I said that Obama’s campaign had similar promises as Ron Paul? That’s because they did And I liked what they both said when they did because I wanted the rules back in place.Back as they were when the government was worried about getting caught surveilling you without a proper warrant, back when there was fucking due process.

It’s gotten dramatically worse.I mean fuck, there may be some inchoate whiny people in this sub, but I am not whining because I can’t make sense out of disorder.I am upset because I witnessed the semblence of order we once had.Go explore for yourself.I often tell people to download or cue up David Fincher’s Se7en.Then after Morgan Freeman’s character suggests this, watch Brad Pitt’s character’s reaction.He goes off on him for even suggesting they do something like that.

Watch that scene today and it seems quaint, like the “olden days”, but it was 20 years ago! If you think the world under a handful of sociopaths in is not much different than the same world under a different handful of sociopaths now, you are blind.It’s night and day.

You are incredibly smug.You have intelligence, but not the wisdom You profess fact and elucidate your interpretations of situations or this sub as if you were a sage, complete with vein of self-proclaimed omniscience But to be truly smart is to realize you know nothing.Ok, so I did review the sanctity of life acts.And it doesn’t speak to abortion, but it does attempt to redefine legal personhood, which then would be protected simply by federal murder statutes which as an aside, aren’t exactly constitutional either, but no one complains I do vaguely remember these.

While I am not in favor of them, he is a representative.I would hope that he had the support of his constituents at least.But the difference is, and my apologies because I wasn’t thinking this through because there is a difference.

Just like I said above where he believes that only Congress is authorized to declare war, he was a strong proponent of the separation of powers.You can believe what you want, but the executive branch—at least constitutionally defined—is not the legislative branch.The executive branch only has a say in the legislative process through his veto power What I forgot to consider above was that he was a representative on one hand, and drafting and passing laws pursuant to the will of his constituents is the job of the House.

I shouldn’t second guess you, but I’m going to predict that you will say that he’d somehow steamroll his “sanctity of life” bill through Congress as president.But how? It never got passed when he was a representative, so how would he possibly get it passed as president, especially when he is such a strict constitutionalist? So, I was wrongfully invoking hyperbole above because he was pushing a bill that redefined when life began, which obviously then would make the fetus protected as a person.

So you were essentially right.I am pro-choice and would have been upset if those bills passed But had he become president, he had stated that his priorities His followers would have been livid if, as president, he somehow tried to backdoor through Congress a law that nullified Roe.

Because doing something like that goes against everything he stands for But I apologize for not recalling those “sanctity of life” bills, and for drawing this discussion out further than necessary.

I mean, ok, but Ron Paul is was a legislator in the legislative branch.So I don’t see the relevance of this.Sorry, I’m not speaking to this point at all.It’s not relevant what he would do in an office he’ll never hold.It’s sufficient to demonstrate the phoniness of his “libertarianism” merely by demonstrating what he did do as a sitting US Representative – attempt to legislate his socially conservative views on every American, consistently, every year he served in the House.

Although, you kept using the phrase “banning abortion”, and I knew of no bills that had any such language.No well, few if any bill that bans something uses the phrase “X is now banned.Certainly a law that has the effect of it being unlawful to obtain an abortion is a law that can be described as “banning abortion.

As you say, the laws were proposed as the Sanctity of Life acts.In your view, is it consistent with libertarianism for Congress to take an official stance, and enforce by law, what Americans are to hold sacred?

I don’t see how it can be, or how that bill can be viewed as anything but an attempt by Ron Paul to hold all Americans since it would apply anywhere within the borders of the US to his own individual notion of religious sanctity.But he doesn’t stand for it.That’s my point.We can judge what he stands for by his activity as a legislator rather than by what he merely pays lip service to.

And that activity as a legislator betrays him as someone who believes the Federal government is a tool to enforce his social views on Americans.Anything he says he believes about Constitutional limits on Federal power is merely an attempt to mislead people and gain their support.That’s why I’m telling you, ignore what he says he believes about Federal power and the libertarian view, and look at what he acts like he believes about Federal power.Even if you don’t think abortion itself a big deal the definition of the liberty in a 14th Amendment context is or should be , which is where the Constitutional issue stems from.

If a person thinks abortion is murder, fine.But who are they to judge? Coveting their neighbor’s wife, stealing, etc.Why do they get to judge other people?

It’s bullshit.I don’t get this.When you think about actual murder, callous people ending the lives of others for a bit of money or some other convenience, do you think “oh well, who am I to judge, I steal a candy bar once in a while” or do you think that should be illegal? Even for Christians the idea that the slightest thing is exactly as bad as murdering children is not remotely ubiquitous, in Catholicism for example they have “mortal” and “venial” sins where something like being jealous of your neighbors wife is forgivable but murdering a child is a ticket straight to hell.

For any reasonable Christian it’s not about judging others, it’s about protecting the children from death.Some believe they have to grow to the age of reason and choose Christianity to get to go to heaven, for example.Those souls are being damned for eternity to purgatory or worse by the people committing the abortions, they are trying to save those people not judge the murderers.

Trying to shame them is mainly a tactic to try to make people stop aborting by overwhelming them with guilt before they do it.The arguments against abortion are more complicated and important than you give them credit for here.

The issues at stake are deeply significant, we are talking about the right to have control over ones own body, and the body is an integral component of the self.

A person forced to carry a pregnancy is very literally a slave.Im always divided on the abortion issue.It’s interesting you say that “a person forced to carry a pregnancy is very literally a slave”.What always boggles my mind is, what is the difference between a fetus and a kid? I guess she could give it up for adoption right? It’s not like we would let the mother kill the kid, or just completely neglect the born child.

And yet, by law she literally has to do that or she will go to jail if the kid dies.Is that not a similar type of “slavery”? As you said adoption is an option.This is essential to the idea of slavery because everything else you said is negated by adoption.You don’t have to force them to not neglect because they have options to not care for the child at all.

That is a legitimate way to completely renounce all responsibility for the child’s welfare.There is no equivalency to that while pregnant, except of course abortion.You are not a slave if you can quit and walk away.That is adoption.But if once pregnant you have to carry to term, and brave the inherent risk of death or debilitation, “quitting” the responsibility is not possible, hence slavery.

The problem is that the same people opposing abortion are also the same ones who disapprove of welfare systems that help children who are already born.If they care so much about unborn children why do they not care much about certain sects of born children? They are also the same people who tend to be pro-gun, pro-military, pro police and pro capital punishment whom also harm and often kill people.There is no logic behind any of the assertions, only sports team programming of wedge issues by laughing elites.

Abortion isn’t the issue, I could have chosen any topic, it’s labeling the things people care about as inconsequential that I took issue with.I’ll continue with it as an example though.Something isn’t going to seem like a wedge issue if it directly affects your life.Now, it’s easy to look at it from an outside perspective and think “Why are we still talking about this?

There are REAL problems to deal with! My point is, most issues have actual people within them who are going to be affected by the outcome.This is what needs to get said.Many people just parrot what the leaders of their group says in order to feel a part of a group.Considering they fancy themselves libertarians, they should have some empathy for protecting body autonomy.People who are against abortion never question the concept of children as essential property of their parents, yet they think a cluster of cells’ right to autonomy trumps the fullly functional being who will have legal power over the cells-cum-human for 18 years.

My only real point being that Tea Partiers are slightly above retarded, brainwashed, and not at all libertarian except when it comes to freedom of racist speech.What bait? I’m not trying to be cryptic.Whether something is ‘consequential’ is pretty subjective depending on how you look at it.That’s my only point.If someone is passionate about an issue telling them it’s inconsequential isn’t going to be any more effective at unifying people than engaging them in an argument.

I’m not just pro-choice.I’m pro-abortion all the time.Sterilize these fucking morons, there’s too many people here already, not to even get started on immigration.

Fuck em all.I’m for post-natal abortion.How about just bathrooms, with full walls and doors that lock.It won’t matter who opens the door.Just remember to put the damn seat back down.Why is it our responsibility to both lift and lower the seat.If it’s so easy for us to lower the seat why isn’t it so easy for you all.Why not look at it as a positive the seat was raised in the first place instead of having someone piss or dribble on the seat that you are going to sit on in the first place.

Because you too, really want to be polite, and leave things as good as or better than you found them.I’m sick of this argument about toilets.I don’t get up in arms when i need to reach down and lift a up a seat in order to piss.Nor do i care when i have to put the seat down for a shit.Jesus fuck it’s a god damn toilet.Leaving a seat up or down does fuck all good if the next person needs it the opposite that it was left.

That’s why it’s got a good damn option on it.So that if you don’t like the way it is you may adjust it.Jesus fuck toilets are the dumbest thing to argue about making the world a better place.I seriously hope that line was a joke.I’m with you.I don’t give two shits if the seat is up or down or if the toilet paper is hung front or back or if there is a member of the opposite sex in there or if the door has gaps in it.I just want to bloody well relieve myself.

The clear option is to have no seat and simply a hole in the ground.If the seat causes such division then clearly the problem is the seat and not the people.Do you like it when you have to poop and you go in half asleep or distracted and sit down, only to realize the seat is up and your ass is in toilet water? No one does.Be polite and close the entire lid as well.

Then we are all expected to put the seat and lid down, problem solved.I also don’t like when I’m half asleep and go to take a piss and it hits the lid and sprays all over my feet so no you lose everyone should be responsible for putting the seat how they want it before using the bathroom period.

I just look at the toilet beforehand and put the seat down if it was left up, why do females act entitled to the seat being down at all times.These days we’re even divided further.

The powers that be do not want us to agree and get along, if that happened we’d have to take a serious look at them.Your reply shows how bad you missed the point.None of this is worth any breath.We need to take on evil.Edit: already getting the downvotes, you stupid religious fucks, you really think your ‘god’ is anything but an illusion designed to keep you under control and following the rules the elites set to keep you in line for centuries?

The fucking commandments are about listening to “authority” Wake the fuck up.Tolerance does not equal acceptance.But you’re right, your Utopia will be different than mine.Guess we just have to find one that works best for the individual! The same people who infiltrated and ended the Native American rights movements Red Army during the 60’s were the Exact same people who infiltrated, split up, and ended the Black Panther Party in the early 70’s.

We must be weary of the CIA and their operatives.Sean Hannity had a guest host on recently who interviewed one of his buddies at DHS.He said explicitly that their primary mission was infiltrating and disrupting movements.I don’t doubt that at all.I remember liking him, and then catching onto the pattern He takes the side that I think the CIA would take, on almost every issue.Trust me, there’s enough people willing to join the cause from all over the world.

Our next step is getting us all together with one plan, a good plan; to actually do something about it.That in my opinion is the biggest and hardest part to overthrow the corrupt in charge.

Where and how do we all come together, and what is the plan? It’s going to start online, it’s the easiest and best way to communicate as of right now.I agree however the sub would need to be private imo.An open forum would invite infiltrators, shills, and provocateurs undermining any movement before it began.

Yeah, it will be private.I’m in the process of starting one, if you want to help let me know.I don’t know what I’m doing.Keep the ball rolling it won’t stop.What about a boycott.It would require individual financial sacrifice, but it would be a non violent way to send a strong message.I see it happening like this: Submit a list of grievances with a due date, if the grievances are not remedied in time we stop going to work and stop unnecessary purchases; basically stop participating economically.

The corporations and govt would have a shit fit due to the lack of revenue.The grievances could include the elimination of the lobby, reversing citizens united, setting term limits for politicians and campaign finance reform.The best part is, we can do this from home.

Non participation.The problem with this is the elite has us right where they want us.Most of us who are bothered by the system are the ones being screwed, so we live by paycheck.

We stop going to work we have no money to support our families with a home and food.A lot of these people rely on huge cooperations because its generally cheaper to buy essentials and food compared to independent businesses.

I would be surprised if there wasn’t some kind of authority watching over this entire discussion like a group of headhunters, looking for the strongest potential warrior to make an example out of.Can’t even get people to agree to disagree Everything is a personal war now, it’s surreal.And the powers that be love it that way.Easy to rule over absolute chaos, as long as instant gratification for the masses is satiated.

Sooo let’s indigogo our militia to get thousands of rifles and rocket launchers, fly Snowden out here, break out every prisoner from prison in Cali and setup base inbetween the border of Mexico, and surround ourselves by EMP weapons.Central HQ will be led by Snowden and our attacks will be nonviolent hacking into all systems as well as automated MITM data obfuscation rendering the web useless unless we explicitly grant the data right of passage.

We will steal NSA tapping devices and extract all the gold to forge a crown for Snowden to wear atop his rack mounted throne with an Occulus rift when we drop to defcon 1.It seems like that is one thing which pretty much everyone can agree one.

We can go back to in-fighting once the threat to everyone is dealt with.It sounds so simple but all we really need to do is put our differences aside, our different beliefs, and just come together for the common goal that we are human and we want freedom.Good luck getting anyone to belive half of this stuff, im not saying its not true, but making people believe all this is next to impossible.I propose that no political party has the ideal solution.

Sometimes the best solution might be Republican.Other problems might best be solved with a Socialist solution.Others with a Democratic one.

We need to ditch the black and white thinking patterns we’ve been trapped in and realize that problems are complex and solutions must be equally so.There needs to be a public speaker for the cause, one that the people who see this corrupt change in society can get behind, who isn’t trying to run for president.They have made a damn good job of making sure that is extremely difficult to do, but it can be done! I was sarcastically talking about the left’s way of unifying us by calling all white people racists.

We all need to kongregate and come up with a coalition that spreads it’s influence to the people.Start with local communities and spread outwards.Raise our children better and retake our education institutions.Plant seeds of change and give back to the those that have worked too hard.That is why we do not go through the traditional social structure.The internet is where the revolution will be televised because it is harder to control than ever.We need a website in which we can share our ideas intelligently and uncensored.

We’ve seen it before in Egypt with the use of facebook.This corruption though, it’s not just American.It’s a global crisis.Let’s be honest, reddit is great as sort of humanity’s working memory, but we need version 2.We need more organization.We need more focus.We ALL need to be able to see the issues that truly matter.I’m building such a website, but I can’t share it with you yet.Whether I build it or not though, it will be built, and we will come together outside of our governments awake.

Just remember that forgiveness and love are your two greatest weapons.They are truth serums.Through love and forgiveness we will rise together like bread.Violence only breeds violence.We’ve seen it over and over.

We all know it in our hearts.Love your enemy and they will become your friend! Not going to happen anytime soon.The economic climate and social structure has led to a deeply divided populace and those two things change very slowly.Obviously two people at complete odds in their values cannot work together.The best thing would be to simply separate into two or more nations, divide the US into various states and let people choose where they want to go.

I’m not from the US, but can’t you found a party which’s main goal is to reform the government so it becomes a government for the people? One prime point should be that a rich should not be able to have more decisive power in the legislative than than a poor one.That’ll be impossible.All sorts of political groups are against the US government.

On this sub alone, nevermind the whole country, I see nationalist socialists and fascists getting into arguments with communists.I see Libertarians and liberals fight with anarchists and conservatives.It goes on and on.I personally have a problem with some parts of this sub.There is a lot of good content it’ll be even better when this fucking election is over , but a lot of poorly sourced theories created by total tinfoil hatters, racists, and others who seek to undermine this community with their outrageous, deliberately absurd ideas to discredit the good things on this sub.

It’s a huge problem.We need to address that and do something about it.First thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.It’s gonna be hard to get all the thug black folk to not throw rocks and commit crimes during any movements to come.There were many addresses of people buying power in the last leak, should be pretty easy to do.Do you really think that there are only black people being thugs? FFS look at that guy that suckerpunched an old woman at a Trump rally.Thugs come in all colors.

Others do it too! I could probably find a video of a fucking raccoon throwing rocks at a window.But blacks cause the majority of all crime in this country and have absolutely no desire to better their country since they’re all drug dealers anyway.I don’t hate the color of their skin, I hate what they’ve done to this country.If they all were responsible and fucking paid attention to what’s going wrong and actually tried to better themselves instead of sitting back and talking about how hard “life on the streets” is then this country would be doing a lot better.

Okay you’re right, everyone is exactly the same and it’s impossible that one race can continue to do bad things because we live in a politically correct society now!

I always forget how easy it is to just close your eyes and tell yourself that facts are irrelevant if they separate a race from the others.Life is good now : carry on! You are expressing yourself, freely.You have every right to do so.You speak with a grain of truth, even.You Americans don’t know how lucky you are with that second amendment.Us Dutch folks got disarmed after the war, and we’re just sitting ducks for the Them right now.

But I understand that this is also a frightening prospect, too.Many would die, many good people on both sides.I think it is of the utmost importance to get the good people on their side to defect..There are many soldiers and police men who might sympathise more with the good cause than with the plutocrats living in theyr lofty palaces.The combined efforts of the U.

Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corp will never be overthrown by a bunch of people with assault rifles.So the American people are equally “sitting ducks”.But what if the soldiers side with the people with rifles? I think it can be possible, and to make it possible people need to be awoken.Nothing will happen until people start going without food, water, and internet.

Not until that point.We have a citizen army, if the cause is universal and clearly outlined I would call it realistically possible.Think of how brainwashed the average person is in this country.Now insert them into a rah rah totalitarian institution that the ignorant praise them for being in and cultivates the idea that any that don’t support the government is un-american.The average soldier that isn’t sent to his home town would fire on you no problem.

You are a rebel and a threat to the american way of life after all, a home grown terrorist.Exactly right.Dehumanize the enemy by making them “the other”.The word terrorist does a great job of that.The idea that soldiers would all defect and if I’m not mistaken they would face death for doing so if not a very long prison sentence instead of firing on their countrymen is laughably naive.

It’s never going to be “the American public is in an uprising! Kill them all! Once enough of these groups are absolutely decimated the motivated strength to unify more groups will be eviscerated.Anyone who thinks they’re going to “take their country back” by stockpiling arms to use against the US military is a fucking idiot.

Look at the taliban, look at the Vietcong.Seeing your neighbors die is a powerful motivator.Drag it on long enough and I believe the will of the military would break first.I never said all will to fight, I said the motivated strength to unify these groups into a single powerful and unified movement.

The unity is what will be destroyed, and small groups fighting their own battles is completely worthless of the goal is to stop the government or the military.While people often talk about how soldiers are taught to protect the constitution I really think they’re taught to follow orders and not ask questions.Do you know any soldiers? It doesn’t matter what the army teaches them they will mostly side with the people.Soldiers fired on and killed four innocent unarmed people for protesting against their corrupt government and a war America should never have been involved in.

So the soldiers are trained to, and usually do, side with their masters.I can’t think of anytime in American history where soldiers sided with the people over the government.Personally I’d see that as rebeling against the British government.There might have been other times but I can’t think of any.Completely different.Multiple generations lived in America apart from normal British society so that they felt as British as you or I feel British.They were just fighting a foreign country that had control over them.

It didn’t feel like a civil war.Some might but I believe the vast majority would side with the government.

I mean these are the people that volunteered to go to war and protect the U.Idk where you are from but from my anecdotal experience, the people in the military that I know would not fire on us civilians.I think it all depends on how the conflict starts.

If the choice is either follow orders or die.It’s hard to say how many would risk defecting.Worked pretty well for the Nazis.They convinced their soldiers to kill quite a few of their own.Lets theorycraft a little.Les play upon the assumption that all of these conspiracys are correct and the government is in a worst case state.

So folks take to the streets with their guns against the government.Media follows suit of the most part.No one likes a riot except folks already rioting.Since we’ve already brought guns into the mix we can kind of assume the police will assume you intend on using them presumably on the government officials you’re targeting.

Assuming groups get to government buildings they’d either take hostages or shooting folks deemed guilty or did you think civil war would be bloodless.Suffice to say this will be covered in great detail by the media.Not too many folks get warm fuzzy feelings about watching old people held at gunpoint or worse.From that point on it would go poorly for the rebels.A few pointless cogs in the machine get shot, statues unveiled a while later.

No major players would get killed because..I have no hope soldiers won’t kill us.They’ve been brainwashed to kill terrorists so their commanders will tell them they are only attacking terrorists and then their brain shuts off.

Tell that to the Viet Cong.The man in the black pajamas devastated our armed forces with small arms and mortars.I’m not talking about the north Vietnamese army.I’m talking about the Viet Cong.Poor farmers who used small arms, booby traps, the cover of darkness to do hit and run guerilla tactics, and psychological warfare against our troops.

Those pheasants weren’t flying around in jets and using tanks.They were sneaky like a ghost in the night and wreaked havoc on our troops.They wanted to be left the fuck alone.They were sick of French rule and viewed the invasion of American forces as just “more of the same”.We , the common man, might align with those ideals, but so would any U.They did not understand the point of the war and many thought that Johnson, Nixon, “Democracy”, “The Domino Theory” etc.

They were more concerned with getting out of Vietnam alive than they were progressing Democratic ideals throughout Vietnam.It sheds some brilliant light on the psyche of the American soldier in Vietnam.Also, where do you think they got the education on how to use them? Vietnam was a proxy war in its finest form.The NVA was supplied by Russia.The Vietcong were supplied by the NVA.

Same theory applies to Russia’s involvement in Afghanistan.We gave them arms to fight against the Soviets.Who supplies the American people fighting for Freedom in times of War? Who comes to our aide? I highly doubt any country would touch us with a 10 foot pole, and I certainly doubt that any uprising by the American public would be looked upon as a way to capitalize by countries like Russia or China.

Imagine the havoc that would come from street-by-street fighting.Army vs.Then imagine an invasion from another country coming in after all the destruction.This is the biggest issue.Most people do not have the training, and, further more, most people are not in shape for some sort of conflict.This applies to physically, emotionally, or psychologically.We have been eating at the trough for far too long.

We’ve gotten soft.All it would take is for the common man to turn on the news, see some people in a distant American city getting slaughtered by tanks and helicopters and they’d give up.I’m not talking about us, I’m talking about commoners.

The people who love their beer and football.Who value their lives and are willing to sacrifice their “liberty for security”.Sadly, those people “deserve neither”.If something were to happen it couldn’t be like Vietnam.It would be quelled before it even gets off the ground.

Technology is too intense and we are too monitored.You make excellent points.Our situation wouldn’t be the same as Vietnam.A majority of Americans have been made fat and stupid.

Our culture is confused.Men are encouraged to be more soft, sensitive, and anti confrontational.Not alot of real men any more.I guess I’m kinda speaking for myself but if SHTF and all I had was small arms I would be implementing sneaky underhanded guerrilla tactics because that would be my best chance with the tools available.Wishful thinking at best but it’s better than no plan at all.

If they are offered food, water, and other resources the masses will be fighting for in trade for their cooperation

: I remember liking him, and then catching onto the pattern

Hope this was helpful.Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time.Skin2 W S.

  • ClassName:find ‘Mesh’ then x:Destroy end end;bL.
  • Name][‘Attachment1’]end end end Iterate LocalPlayer.
  • The data actually doesnt actually prove police are more violent.
  • Get more download news Submit.
  • Horse:WaitForChild “Body”.

If your brwoser states that the download was “blocked” simply head over to the downloads section on your browser and press “keep”.Ensure you have the latest version of.NET Framework, you may download it from here , you must download the runtime and install it.This could mean many things, certain Software require weekly updating for the most recent versioning of the game, if the execution of a script is crashing your game this could mean the Software does not support the script.

You can check if the Software is up to date by checking the date on the website.You can get away from your computer! Script will do all work for you! Edit Delete.Delete cheat.Rkrquu La2m from i0.Not a member of pastebin yet? Ragdoll engine script, ragdoll engine hack, roblox ragdoll engine hacks, ragdoll engine push ragdoll engine hack script super fling: Script 1:pastebin.This gui will allow you to, place bombs without cooldown or the gamepass, bomb all, crash the server, make the map or players invisible.

Is there any doom marauder pastebin? Home ragdoll engine 2 gui’s.Ragdoll engine script, ragdoll engine hack, roblox ragdoll engine hacks, ragdoll engine push ragdoll engine hack script super fling: Today i’m going to be doing another roblox script review! Credits to aztup for the ui library old version.I threw together this gui with some imo nice parts for the game ragdoll engine.

Remastered 3 bomb simulator 2.I know some of you guys needa a tutorial nad getting confused on exploits so just have a level 7 exploit just download and the scripts are in desc.Today i’m going to be doing another roblox script review! How do i use these scripts? This is a really good ragdoll engine gui to troll with and make people mad xd script: By scrip] mater, 1 week ago.Trending scripts last 24 hours.

Maret 11, Ragdoll engine gui script pastebin krnl : By continuing to use pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the cookies policy.Posting Komentar.April 15, After leaking earlier this month, spotify launched a page today that lets u.Spotify this morning officially announced the limited u.Release of its first hardware device, the oddly named car thing , aimed at spotify premium subscribers.Find the latest spotify technology s.

Car thing requires that you maintain a paid spotify premium subscription directly via spotify and a smartphone with wifi or mobile data connection.

Latest commit

Because when blacks and whites are against each other, we cannot be together against the likes of George Soros.Until we as a group all realise this, we won’t be able to achieve anything.I forget who, it may have been one of the Mersheimer and Walt guys from the Israeli Lobby book and docu who posit that governments are much more likely to lie to their own population than to foreign governments because a nation’s citizens don’t want to think their own government would lie to them and foreign governments are more skeptical.

It’s definitely a problem that we spend too much time looking to the left and right for enemies when we should all be looking up.What we should be mindful of is that opportunity is always there for those that seek it.Even splintered groups have common ground.Id venture that its the antinationalists who are much more trusting of govenment than nationalists.Im a nationalist, and our government is the problem.

So give them a new face to ralley behind.Say we’re actually doing it.Show momentum and see who jumps ship to join with the winning side.A govt is people.We are people.We have the ability to take it back.For example, you bringing up BLM.Let the group be.Don’t focus on it.Focus on the non-wedge issues.Why start a fight about what some people disagree about when you can start a dialogue about something we all agree on?

That’s one thing I’m ok with about capitalism..You make your own money..But not capitalist current America.You make money for the government.Communism, by definition is a classless society.Every ‘example’ of Communism has a very clear leading party.In theory that money helps you.

The issue is capitalist greed keeping that money away from you.Capitalism is the reason you hate the government.It requires greed, and greed causes corruption.Communism, and other Socialist policies relies on sharing and empathy.Actually caring about fellow man.Black Lives Matter is smeared by the media and most middle class people, though.This is just a tactic – used again, and again, and again – to turn slightly better off people against oppressed African Americans.

This tactic was used with indentured servants you’ve got it so much better than the slaves! So don’t blame the other people who are protesting.

The real ‘wedge’ issues involve stupid stereotypes like the black welfare queen, the lazy Mexican, the entitled millennial, the ‘useless’ liberal arts graduates, the ‘feminazi’, the crazy environmental activist, etc.Additionally, the elite abuse policy stances on things like abortion, birth control, taxes, public schools, healthcare and the minimum wage to make us poor, sick, and incapable of caring for our own kids.

That doesn’t mean they had nothing legitimate to protest.The political spin merchants reinforce those wedge issues every day.What we can do is, somehow, reinforce the many, many other issues upon which are generally agreed.I’m a firm believer that individuals living today have more in common than that which divides us.These commonalities go unnoticed, as we take them for granted.

Everybody wants to feel that what they do is appreciated.This is probably not available to be enforced through public measures, but it’s an important commonality nonetheless.I never understood why we don’t have at least a 4 day work week.This is just a standard that is uniform around the world.If the markets could be stabilized, you could switch to a 4 day work week in a matter of days.What is the relation between “stable” markets and a 4 day work week?

Also, how do you define “stable”? For real though.I think it’s about time the people stop with this petty left or right bullshit until we get corruption out of our government.Everything else can wait because nothing will fucking change one way or another if the government doesn’t listen to us.There is only we, the individuals, and those who would enslave us.

Those are the only groups that matter.Come on boy, come on boy, look! It’s a Bible! And a gun! And a gay guy! Over here! Come on boy! Don’t forget that they can distort how effective those wedge issues seem.They can make it seem like tons of people are prepared to be violent over seemingly trivial shit when in reality that’s not the case.

Agent provocateurs and the media can make all sorts of shit go south if they know people are not getting news elsewhere.The first step is getting people to look past that bubble.Their plans are starting to fail.

People are starting to see the lies for what they are, the wedge issues are changing from manipulation to identifiers.They made the mistake of being too cocky and the tide has turned, we are working together now.The manipulation was so over the top that it’s crumbling now, we are taking the power back day by day.But I’m for small government and no abortions and you are the exact opposite of me!!!! You want trannys in every stall!!!

This is so true.I went to a Tea Party meeting in my county where Gary Johnson attended.Then, when asked about abortion, Gary said he was pro choice.It’s so silly to allow inconsequential wedge issues to divide us.Unification is what scares the Establishment – so they do everything they can to get our conversations to move back to the philosophical wedge issues that waste our time.

EDIT: Stop trying to get me to talk about abortion or any other wedge issue.I am saying that issues where there’s agreement are the important ones.Issues of conversation meant to confuse everyone and sidetrack them into debate are what I have a problem with.Further, one’s opinion, honestly, is not going to effect a change in a term or even two terms.

I remember back in when I was very apolitical , the liberals then were screaming, “OMG, you can’t even consider George Bush I didn’t care much for either candidate then, but I knew that if there was a vacancy, a conservative leaning judge probably would be appointed, but that did not guarantee he would only write pro-life opinions, and further, even if said justice was a rabid, singular minded pro-lifer, it would only matter if a case on point was granted certiorari and heard That’s a lot of hoops.

To me, the whole argument was unnecessary panic.But they did it again in You had an amazing bipartisan grass roots movement for Ron Paul, running on a lot of principles of Obama’s campaign which turned out to be a masterful swindle.

Ron Paul wanted out of the interventionist wars, he wanted to sever wall street and federal government ties, ending the Fed, end bailouts, end quantitative easing, promote transparency, support whistleblowers, etc.

It was simply a candidate with integrity who was not going to play the game in Washington.But in interviews, when asked about his abortion stance, he answered honestly and said he was pro-life, but that this view was personal and he didn’t believe in influencing policy based on his personal views [He did however believe that — like gay marriage and following the doctrine of federalism — that states should decide for themselves.

That one particular view turned every liberal against him and of course later, there were the so-called racist newsletters which were so distorted by the media , not to mention the fact that countless primaries were stolen from him But my point is And anyway, such a view almost certainly will not upset the current policy in place with Roe.But in interviews, when asked about his abortion stance, he answered honestly and said he was pro-life, but that this view was personal and he didn’t believe in influencing policy based on his personal views.

Well, ok, but did you look up what he actually did? Or was his lip service enough? Because what he did was attempt to pass legislation to ban abortion at the Federal level every single year he served in Congress.So much for his view being personal ; individual choices about the sanctity of life is just a little too much personal freedom for ol’ Ron Paul.

This is legal and complicated.I don’t know what he voted for.But the federal government can only do certain things.The President, Congress, Courts, all have enumerated powers.If it’s not specified as something they can do in the Constitution, then they can’t do it.One one hand, some people wanted it But opponents said, “Why? The Constitution gives power from the people to the federal government, so it follows that anything not given is automatically retained And further, in years, people might believe that this bill of rights merely enumerates a finite list of rights—at the exclusion of all others.

They agreed on the Bill of Rights, or Ten Amendments to the Constitution, but only with the following 9th and 10th amendments.These amendments are:.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.First, I know how things have evolved today, and that the Constitution is ignored.Essentially our government is illegal.But Ron Paul can’t vote on a bill to ban abortion at the federal level because the federal government has no rights whatsoever as it pertains to abortion—either in the Constitution or derived from common law.

What Roe did was in a very vague and convoluted way bring it under substantive due process stating that a woman could have an abortion I think the outcome is good I’m pro-choice , but I think the way it was done was flawed and if you read the opinion, somewhat of a reach.

Compare this to gay marriage I loved it when fucking Bush was saying that he was going to pass a law prohibiting gay marriage That’s ludicrous! The federal government has no power whatsoever to say word one about marriage.What finally happened with gay marriage is what should have happened: the federal government just stopped talking about it, and the states were left to decide on their own.

Historically, things like marriage and family have always been governed by reach individual state it’s how most laws should be It’s like pot laws now So Ron Paul was not voting to “ban abortion” in any way.He was however trying to proceed the same way that Gay Marriage ultimately resolved itself: take federal hands off of it, let the states decide.But then of course liberals heard this and immediately thought that every woman was going to be forced to go back to coat hanger abortions in alleyways.

But in or in other words in our more enlightened era today this would not happen.But they would not last.Public policy and common sense would overrule the moronic religious right in time.Look, I mean, you can look up his record yourself – he regularly voted for bills that would have made abortion illegal at the Federal level, by finding for fetuses a Federal right not to be aborted.He absolutely was voting to ban abortion at the Federal level, which indicates he absolutely believed the Federal government had the Constitutional authority to do so.

Look, you said yourself you don’t know what he voted for.Why don’t you educate yourself on what Ron Paul does, instead of what he says? The theories of government by which he actually tries to govern, instead of what he purports to govern by? I’d be happy to.He has a huge congressional record and I don’t even know what years or the name of the bill..

I’m only saying that until Roe there was no way the federal government could do anything regarding abortion.With Roe they used medical necessity and legal gymnastics to fit it into a substantive due process right.I’ll concede that RP might have been voting to simply remove abortion from the purview of the federal government.

If George Bush had brought a Supreme Court Case to place all marriage under the domain of the federal government which would then allow Congress to pass a law prohibiting gay marriage , it would be the same as someone voting on a bill which removed marriage from being under the authority of the federal government I’m saying it’s a different goal.

Voting to take abortion out of the hands of the federal government so the federal government would have no authority over it is not the same as “banning it”, and banning then would apply to the entire country.

The drug laws ban “drugs” at the federal level, so no matter what the states have as their drug laws, the federal laws control and they are illegal.So if RP was voting to create a law that banned abortion as a federal statute , it would apply to every state, and that would have been a huge issue that would have been brought up every time he sat down for any interview RP was far more of a “no law” or “less law” kind of guy as opposed to more laws.

So I could see him voting for removing all laws having to do with abortion at the federal level All of that is fully in the public record, and I definitely linked it to you as well.You can read the text and explanation of the bills Ron Paul submitted to Congress.But you’re mistaken.For instance, the Federal government could have passed a constitutional amendment banning abortion throughout the country, which could then be ratified by a majority of the states, thereby banning abortion in all of them.

That’s the most extreme example – what Ron Paul actually tried to do was backdoor-ban it at the Federal level by finding a constitutional right of individual fetuses not to be aborted, which would have the same effect, because the states cannot restrict your Federal constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment.

I don’t understand what you think you’re “conceding” there.I mean I’m directly telling you that’s not the case.Ron Paul’s proposed legislation would not have removed abortion from the purview of the Federal government; it would have banned abortion by requiring the Federal government to prosecute any abortion as the murder of a US citizen.Voting to take abortion out of the hands of the federal government so the federal government would have no authority over it is not the same as “banning it”.

Yes, I get that.But that’s not what Ron Paul ever attempted to do.What he repeatedly voted for was a ban on abortion that applied universally within the borders of the United States, and which would have pre-empted state authority of the issue altogether, by the supremacy clause.Well, unless people accepted his lip service at face value instead of looking into his record.

You know, like you did.I’ll look it up But if this was actually what he was trying to do, then fuck If he was actually drafting the bills you speak of, then he was one of the most hypocritical men who has ran for president in the past fifteen years.

I realize I don’t know the man personally, so I can’t claim to know his true intentions But I’ve looked at parts of his voting record and never saw anything like this but you can’t always tell by names of bills.

But if he really was engineering an end around to Roe and such endeavors were motivated purely on his personal beliefs then these actions would stand in diametric opposition to his oft-stated philosophy of government: that representatives act on behalf of their constituents, and the federal government should act within the parameters of the Constitution: echoed in his views to end the drug war or require that Congress declare war, etc.

In other words, the federal laws and executive power must fall within specifically enumerated authority granted by the Constitution.This is like telling me that the Beatles were a boy band manufactured by EMI and Capital records, with all their songs written by a team of songwriters headed by Neil Diamond and Glen Cambell.

How is that in any way newsworthy? I think you’re severely underestimating how common the knowledge is that Ron Paul’s libertarianism is a total hypocritical sham.A bill that redefines personhood to conception, has at its core a philosophical debate and not Legal one.I don’t agree with it, but I can see how he could reconcile such a bill with his views as a libertarian.Does that “sanctity of life” bill sound authoritarian to you? It’s simply redefining when life starts.

Through that redefinition, I acknowledge there would be secondary effects, but I don’t think it makes his “libertarianism” a sham.I’d have to read the entire bill, but my guess is that it was a way for him to implement his pro-life views but allow him to sleep at night.Further, the pro-life perspective, though it’s inherently flawed, is rooted in that person who subscribes to pro-life believing that, through some kind of imaginary subjugation they are the voice of the fetus, so they believe that pro-choice rights infringe on them.

I agree it’s not a legal argument, and I disagree with it entirely, yet I still empathize or at least try to with the way they feel.It’s the way I’d want to be treated.Sure, but for the explicit and sole purpose of banning abortion.

It wouldn’t apply to, say, calculating your age for any legal purpose – your legal age wouldn’t be advanced 9 months to account for the extra time, retroactively, that you had been a person.That indicates that this is just Ron Paul reasoning backwards from the outcome he’d like – a total ban on abortion within the borders of the United States.I mean it does – what’s libertarian , explicitly, about the Federal government determining on behalf of the states when life begins?

If the people of California desire to affirm that life begins at birth, for what reason does Ron Paul override that view with his own more restrictive definition? Well, obviously, because it’s his desire as a social conservative that the people of California not be able to avail themselves of abortions.

First regarding, “banning abortion”, I didn’t mean that specific language.A bill redefining when life begins doesn’t address abortion, but it affects it indirectly And I know he never promoted a bill that sought to regulate abortion directly in any way.

I know the manner in which laws prohibiting a certain act or undertaking, or the possession or sale of some item are drafted.Second, I’ll acquiesce and say that RP’s promotion of those bills are not one of his prouder moments.But I still believe that above everything, his integrity is the most important value to him.As such, i he promoted a bill redefining when life begins, and not abortion itself, avoiding in form if not substance, a patent legislation of his personal morality, and ; ii probably had the requisite numbers of those in his Texas district in favor of such a bill as he’d want to be sure he was acting on behalf of those who put him in office.

As I suggested, maybe he did these things so he could sleep at night But waaaiiit just a bit on your conclusion that he’s a social conservative.He may have his view on pro-life He had a “hands off” policy on gay marriage which is the current working policy and he wanted to end the war on drugs.Do you know of other social issues in which his leaning was something other than his libertarian ideology?

The effect is obviously direct, and obviously the intent of the legislation.No one cares about the definition of the “beginning of life” except those opposed to abortion.

I mean except for the bills I keep showing you.So, again, you’re completely mistaken – Paul has , on regular occasions, supported and voted for bills that directly prohibit abortions at the Federal level.I don’t know what else I have to show you to prove to you that this is not an issue that Paul “leaves to the states.Well, sure.Uniquely, he’s the only southern conservative Republican trying to hoodwink you into thinking he’s some kind of Republi-tarian who opposes abortion but won’t vote on that basis.

The problem I’m trying to get across to you is, all the evidence you have from that comes from Ron Paul telling you it’s true.But it isn’t.He just wants you to think that.Only the second of those is true.From everything you’ve told me and that I’ve read today, I am more acutely aware of Ron Paul’s politics as a representative.

I’m disappointed in Paul and that he would sponsor the Marriage Protection Act — an Act that would have prevented federal courts from interpreting DOMA before it was struck down.I give you credit for enlightening me I sincerely mean that.Notwithstanding all of that, when you balance out the bad from the good, there was still no better candidate than him in I voted for Obama, and he lied about virtually everything he campaigned for transparency, whistleblowers, slashing military budget, etc.

Paul had the Republican nomination stolen from him, as a follower I saw every media outlet ignore him, and the Establishment Republican party insert Mitt Romney.

I couldn’t stand Romney, but Obama had himself only given lip service to everything he supposedly was for.I didn’t vote in I couldn’t.Ron Paul is not relevant any more, and I suppose the only reason I put effort into defending him today though I was wrong about some things is because I brought him up above as a viable candidate for president in I’ll admit he’s not as libertarian as he professes, and he is conservative on some social issues, but despite that, he was better than any Republican candidate, and a better candidate than Obama, who had shown for four years that he could do the opposite of what he campaigned for in I mean they’re not.

Not by anything objective we can measure.But the truth is that things are not worse.That’s scientific fact, if you recognize science.And nothing happens in this subreddit except what conspiracy the rists are always doing, which is attempting to explain the world in some other way than the most obvious – that the world is just what happens when you mix up a lot of basically good but human people and a small number of sociopaths and unevenly distribute them in the very thin layer between rock and space, in the places where it’s not too wet and not too dry.

And then it just takes one idiot, or one true villian, to really cock things up.And the story that the world is controlled by a small number of powerful evil-doers is just that, a story , a story mental children tell themselves because the notion that the world is someone’s evil vision and they themselves are the heroes who will eventually do something about it is still less scarier than the truth that nobody’s really in charge, and this world is what it looks like even when our institutions are run by decent and honest people which, overwhelmingly, they are.

I mean I don’t even think Ron Paul is a bad guy, even after the stuff I’ve said about him; I think he’s just got a very different view of things than I do, or ever will, and even his dishonesty could be explained as the act of a basically good person who believes in something feeling like he’s running out of time to achieve it, and starting to take shortcuts.None of that’s meant to talk you into support for Obama.It’s meant to talk you out of pinning all your hopes on the next charismatic leader.

Because the world isn’t helped by leaders.Believe it or not, it’s helped by committees.It’s not just charisma that draws me.

I was out of college in the early s, and things weren’t bad.I went to law school and became an attorney, and made a good amount of money and then invested in commercial real estate.I did well, sold some but wasn’t on top of everything in the mortgage market have you seen “The Big Short”?

I’m working my way back, but a lot has changed since I graduated law school.During the s while in law school the law and the constitution were still applicable.

I may be an atheist, but I believed in a certain level of predictable stability with the rules of government, and the rules that I expected the government to heed.We as a nation were maybe two trillion in debt in I can’t even remember.As I said above, when Bush was running I was apolitical.After the Patriot Act, and Iraq..Then Obama and his crushing of whistleblowers, and invoking state secrets bullshit.

It’s wrong.I did take solace in Obama’s words in Then in , the same with Ron Paul.But remember above where I compared them? I said that Obama’s campaign had similar promises as Ron Paul?

That’s because they did And I liked what they both said when they did because I wanted the rules back in place.Back as they were when the government was worried about getting caught surveilling you without a proper warrant, back when there was fucking due process.

It’s gotten dramatically worse.I mean fuck, there may be some inchoate whiny people in this sub, but I am not whining because I can’t make sense out of disorder.

I am upset because I witnessed the semblence of order we once had.Go explore for yourself.I often tell people to download or cue up David Fincher’s Se7en.Then after Morgan Freeman’s character suggests this, watch Brad Pitt’s character’s reaction.

He goes off on him for even suggesting they do something like that.Watch that scene today and it seems quaint, like the “olden days”, but it was 20 years ago!

If you think the world under a handful of sociopaths in is not much different than the same world under a different handful of sociopaths now, you are blind.It’s night and day.You are incredibly smug.You have intelligence, but not the wisdom You profess fact and elucidate your interpretations of situations or this sub as if you were a sage, complete with vein of self-proclaimed omniscience But to be truly smart is to realize you know nothing.Ok, so I did review the sanctity of life acts.And it doesn’t speak to abortion, but it does attempt to redefine legal personhood, which then would be protected simply by federal murder statutes which as an aside, aren’t exactly constitutional either, but no one complains I do vaguely remember these.

While I am not in favor of them, he is a representative.I would hope that he had the support of his constituents at least.But the difference is, and my apologies because I wasn’t thinking this through because there is a difference.Just like I said above where he believes that only Congress is authorized to declare war, he was a strong proponent of the separation of powers.

You can believe what you want, but the executive branch—at least constitutionally defined—is not the legislative branch.The executive branch only has a say in the legislative process through his veto power What I forgot to consider above was that he was a representative on one hand, and drafting and passing laws pursuant to the will of his constituents is the job of the House.I shouldn’t second guess you, but I’m going to predict that you will say that he’d somehow steamroll his “sanctity of life” bill through Congress as president.

But how? It never got passed when he was a representative, so how would he possibly get it passed as president, especially when he is such a strict constitutionalist? So, I was wrongfully invoking hyperbole above because he was pushing a bill that redefined when life began, which obviously then would make the fetus protected as a person.So you were essentially right.I am pro-choice and would have been upset if those bills passed But had he become president, he had stated that his priorities His followers would have been livid if, as president, he somehow tried to backdoor through Congress a law that nullified Roe.

Because doing something like that goes against everything he stands for But I apologize for not recalling those “sanctity of life” bills, and for drawing this discussion out further than necessary.I mean, ok, but Ron Paul is was a legislator in the legislative branch.So I don’t see the relevance of this.Sorry, I’m not speaking to this point at all.It’s not relevant what he would do in an office he’ll never hold.

It’s sufficient to demonstrate the phoniness of his “libertarianism” merely by demonstrating what he did do as a sitting US Representative – attempt to legislate his socially conservative views on every American, consistently, every year he served in the House.Although, you kept using the phrase “banning abortion”, and I knew of no bills that had any such language.No well, few if any bill that bans something uses the phrase “X is now banned.

Certainly a law that has the effect of it being unlawful to obtain an abortion is a law that can be described as “banning abortion.As you say, the laws were proposed as the Sanctity of Life acts.In your view, is it consistent with libertarianism for Congress to take an official stance, and enforce by law, what Americans are to hold sacred? I don’t see how it can be, or how that bill can be viewed as anything but an attempt by Ron Paul to hold all Americans since it would apply anywhere within the borders of the US to his own individual notion of religious sanctity.

But he doesn’t stand for it.That’s my point.We can judge what he stands for by his activity as a legislator rather than by what he merely pays lip service to.And that activity as a legislator betrays him as someone who believes the Federal government is a tool to enforce his social views on Americans.

Anything he says he believes about Constitutional limits on Federal power is merely an attempt to mislead people and gain their support.That’s why I’m telling you, ignore what he says he believes about Federal power and the libertarian view, and look at what he acts like he believes about Federal power.

Even if you don’t think abortion itself a big deal the definition of the liberty in a 14th Amendment context is or should be , which is where the Constitutional issue stems from.

If a person thinks abortion is murder, fine.But who are they to judge? Coveting their neighbor’s wife, stealing, etc.Why do they get to judge other people? It’s bullshit.I don’t get this.When you think about actual murder, callous people ending the lives of others for a bit of money or some other convenience, do you think “oh well, who am I to judge, I steal a candy bar once in a while” or do you think that should be illegal? Even for Christians the idea that the slightest thing is exactly as bad as murdering children is not remotely ubiquitous, in Catholicism for example they have “mortal” and “venial” sins where something like being jealous of your neighbors wife is forgivable but murdering a child is a ticket straight to hell.

For any reasonable Christian it’s not about judging others, it’s about protecting the children from death.Some believe they have to grow to the age of reason and choose Christianity to get to go to heaven, for example.

Those souls are being damned for eternity to purgatory or worse by the people committing the abortions, they are trying to save those people not judge the murderers.

Trying to shame them is mainly a tactic to try to make people stop aborting by overwhelming them with guilt before they do it.The arguments against abortion are more complicated and important than you give them credit for here.

The issues at stake are deeply significant, we are talking about the right to have control over ones own body, and the body is an integral component of the self.

A person forced to carry a pregnancy is very literally a slave.Im always divided on the abortion issue.It’s interesting you say that “a person forced to carry a pregnancy is very literally a slave”.

What always boggles my mind is, what is the difference between a fetus and a kid? I guess she could give it up for adoption right? It’s not like we would let the mother kill the kid, or just completely neglect the born child.And yet, by law she literally has to do that or she will go to jail if the kid dies.

Is that not a similar type of “slavery”? As you said adoption is an option.This is essential to the idea of slavery because everything else you said is negated by adoption.You don’t have to force them to not neglect because they have options to not care for the child at all.That is a legitimate way to completely renounce all responsibility for the child’s welfare.

There is no equivalency to that while pregnant, except of course abortion.You are not a slave if you can quit and walk away.

That is adoption.But if once pregnant you have to carry to term, and brave the inherent risk of death or debilitation, “quitting” the responsibility is not possible, hence slavery.The problem is that the same people opposing abortion are also the same ones who disapprove of welfare systems that help children who are already born.If they care so much about unborn children why do they not care much about certain sects of born children?

They are also the same people who tend to be pro-gun, pro-military, pro police and pro capital punishment whom also harm and often kill people.

There is no logic behind any of the assertions, only sports team programming of wedge issues by laughing elites.Abortion isn’t the issue, I could have chosen any topic, it’s labeling the things people care about as inconsequential that I took issue with.I’ll continue with it as an example though.Something isn’t going to seem like a wedge issue if it directly affects your life.Now, it’s easy to look at it from an outside perspective and think “Why are we still talking about this?

There are REAL problems to deal with! My point is, most issues have actual people within them who are going to be affected by the outcome.This is what needs to get said.Many people just parrot what the leaders of their group says in order to feel a part of a group.

Considering they fancy themselves libertarians, they should have some empathy for protecting body autonomy.People who are against abortion never question the concept of children as essential property of their parents, yet they think a cluster of cells’ right to autonomy trumps the fullly functional being who will have legal power over the cells-cum-human for 18 years.

My only real point being that Tea Partiers are slightly above retarded, brainwashed, and not at all libertarian except when it comes to freedom of racist speech.What bait? I’m not trying to be cryptic.Whether something is ‘consequential’ is pretty subjective depending on how you look at it.That’s my only point.If someone is passionate about an issue telling them it’s inconsequential isn’t going to be any more effective at unifying people than engaging them in an argument.

I’m not just pro-choice.I’m pro-abortion all the time.Sterilize these fucking morons, there’s too many people here already, not to even get started on immigration.Fuck em all.I’m for post-natal abortion.

How about just bathrooms, with full walls and doors that lock.It won’t matter who opens the door.Just remember to put the damn seat back down.

Why is it our responsibility to both lift and lower the seat.If it’s so easy for us to lower the seat why isn’t it so easy for you all.Why not look at it as a positive the seat was raised in the first place instead of having someone piss or dribble on the seat that you are going to sit on in the first place.

Because you too, really want to be polite, and leave things as good as or better than you found them.I’m sick of this argument about toilets.I don’t get up in arms when i need to reach down and lift a up a seat in order to piss.Nor do i care when i have to put the seat down for a shit.Jesus fuck it’s a god damn toilet.Leaving a seat up or down does fuck all good if the next person needs it the opposite that it was left.

That’s why it’s got a good damn option on it.So that if you don’t like the way it is you may adjust it.Jesus fuck toilets are the dumbest thing to argue about making the world a better place.I seriously hope that line was a joke.I’m with you.I don’t give two shits if the seat is up or down or if the toilet paper is hung front or back or if there is a member of the opposite sex in there or if the door has gaps in it.

I just want to bloody well relieve myself.The clear option is to have no seat and simply a hole in the ground.If the seat causes such division then clearly the problem is the seat and not the people.Do you like it when you have to poop and you go in half asleep or distracted and sit down, only to realize the seat is up and your ass is in toilet water?

No one does.Be polite and close the entire lid as well.Then we are all expected to put the seat and lid down, problem solved.I also don’t like when I’m half asleep and go to take a piss and it hits the lid and sprays all over my feet so no you lose everyone should be responsible for putting the seat how they want it before using the bathroom period.

I just look at the toilet beforehand and put the seat down if it was left up, why do females act entitled to the seat being down at all times.These days we’re even divided further.The powers that be do not want us to agree and get along, if that happened we’d have to take a serious look at them.

Your reply shows how bad you missed the point.None of this is worth any breath.We need to take on evil.Edit: already getting the downvotes, you stupid religious fucks, you really think your ‘god’ is anything but an illusion designed to keep you under control and following the rules the elites set to keep you in line for centuries?

The fucking commandments are about listening to “authority” Wake the fuck up.Tolerance does not equal acceptance.But you’re right, your Utopia will be different than mine.Guess we just have to find one that works best for the individual!

The same people who infiltrated and ended the Native American rights movements Red Army during the 60’s were the Exact same people who infiltrated, split up, and ended the Black Panther Party in the early 70’s.

We must be weary of the CIA and their operatives.Sean Hannity had a guest host on recently who interviewed one of his buddies at DHS.He said explicitly that their primary mission was infiltrating and disrupting movements.I don’t doubt that at all.I remember liking him, and then catching onto the pattern He takes the side that I think the CIA would take, on almost every issue.Trust me, there’s enough people willing to join the cause from all over the world.

Our next step is getting us all together with one plan, a good plan; to actually do something about it.That in my opinion is the biggest and hardest part to overthrow the corrupt in charge.

Where and how do we all come together, and what is the plan? It’s going to start online, it’s the easiest and best way to communicate as of right now.

I agree however the sub would need to be private imo.An open forum would invite infiltrators, shills, and provocateurs undermining any movement before it began.Yeah, it will be private.I’m in the process of starting one, if you want to help let me know.I don’t know what I’m doing.Keep the ball rolling it won’t stop.What about a boycott.It would require individual financial sacrifice, but it would be a non violent way to send a strong message.

I see it happening like this: Submit a list of grievances with a due date, if the grievances are not remedied in time we stop going to work and stop unnecessary purchases; basically stop participating economically.The corporations and govt would have a shit fit due to the lack of revenue.The grievances could include the elimination of the lobby, reversing citizens united, setting term limits for politicians and campaign finance reform.

The best part is, we can do this from home.Non participation.The problem with this is the elite has us right where they want us.Most of us who are bothered by the system are the ones being screwed, so we live by paycheck.We stop going to work we have no money to support our families with a home and food.A lot of these people rely on huge cooperations because its generally cheaper to buy essentials and food compared to independent businesses.

I would be surprised if there wasn’t some kind of authority watching over this entire discussion like a group of headhunters, looking for the strongest potential warrior to make an example out of.Can’t even get people to agree to disagree Everything is a personal war now, it’s surreal.And the powers that be love it that way.

Easy to rule over absolute chaos, as long as instant gratification for the masses is satiated.Sooo let’s indigogo our militia to get thousands of rifles and rocket launchers, fly Snowden out here, break out every prisoner from prison in Cali and setup base inbetween the border of Mexico, and surround ourselves by EMP weapons.Central HQ will be led by Snowden and our attacks will be nonviolent hacking into all systems as well as automated MITM data obfuscation rendering the web useless unless we explicitly grant the data right of passage.

We will steal NSA tapping devices and extract all the gold to forge a crown for Snowden to wear atop his rack mounted throne with an Occulus rift when we drop to defcon 1.It seems like that is one thing which pretty much everyone can agree one.We can go back to in-fighting once the threat to everyone is dealt with.It sounds so simple but all we really need to do is put our differences aside, our different beliefs, and just come together for the common goal that we are human and we want freedom.

Good luck getting anyone to belive half of this stuff, im not saying its not true, but making people believe all this is next to impossible.I propose that no political party has the ideal solution.Sometimes the best solution might be Republican.Other problems might best be solved with a Socialist solution.Others with a Democratic one.We need to ditch the black and white thinking patterns we’ve been trapped in and realize that problems are complex and solutions must be equally so.

There needs to be a public speaker for the cause, one that the people who see this corrupt change in society can get behind, who isn’t trying to run for president.They have made a damn good job of making sure that is extremely difficult to do, but it can be done! I was sarcastically talking about the left’s way of unifying us by calling all white people racists.We all need to kongregate and come up with a coalition that spreads it’s influence to the people.

Start with local communities and spread outwards.Raise our children better and retake our education institutions.Plant seeds of change and give back to the those that have worked too hard.That is why we do not go through the traditional social structure.The internet is where the revolution will be televised because it is harder to control than ever.We need a website in which we can share our ideas intelligently and uncensored.We’ve seen it before in Egypt with the use of facebook.

This corruption though, it’s not just American.It’s a global crisis.Let’s be honest, reddit is great as sort of humanity’s working memory, but we need version 2.

We need more organization.We need more focus.We ALL need to be able to see the issues that truly matter.I’m building such a website, but I can’t share it with you yet.Whether I build it or not though, it will be built, and we will come together outside of our governments awake.Just remember that forgiveness and love are your two greatest weapons.

They are truth serums.Through love and forgiveness we will rise together like bread.Violence only breeds violence.We’ve seen it over and over.We all know it in our hearts.Love your enemy and they will become your friend! Not going to happen anytime soon.The economic climate and social structure has led to a deeply divided populace and those two things change very slowly.Obviously two people at complete odds in their values cannot work together.

The best thing would be to simply separate into two or more nations, divide the US into various states and let people choose where they want to go.I’m not from the US, but can’t you found a party which’s main goal is to reform the government so it becomes a government for the people? One prime point should be that a rich should not be able to have more decisive power in the legislative than than a poor one.That’ll be impossible.

All sorts of political groups are against the US government.On this sub alone, nevermind the whole country, I see nationalist socialists and fascists getting into arguments with communists.I see Libertarians and liberals fight with anarchists and conservatives.It goes on and on.I personally have a problem with some parts of this sub.There is a lot of good content it’ll be even better when this fucking election is over , but a lot of poorly sourced theories created by total tinfoil hatters, racists, and others who seek to undermine this community with their outrageous, deliberately absurd ideas to discredit the good things on this sub.

It’s a huge problem.We need to address that and do something about it.First thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.It’s gonna be hard to get all the thug black folk to not throw rocks and commit crimes during any movements to come.There were many addresses of people buying power in the last leak, should be pretty easy to do.

Do you really think that there are only black people being thugs? FFS look at that guy that suckerpunched an old woman at a Trump rally.Thugs come in all colors.Others do it too! I could probably find a video of a fucking raccoon throwing rocks at a window.But blacks cause the majority of all crime in this country and have absolutely no desire to better their country since they’re all drug dealers anyway.I don’t hate the color of their skin, I hate what they’ve done to this country.

If they all were responsible and fucking paid attention to what’s going wrong and actually tried to better themselves instead of sitting back and talking about how hard “life on the streets” is then this country would be doing a lot better.

Okay you’re right, everyone is exactly the same and it’s impossible that one race can continue to do bad things because we live in a politically correct society now! I always forget how easy it is to just close your eyes and tell yourself that facts are irrelevant if they separate a race from the others.

Life is good now : carry on! You are expressing yourself, freely.You have every right to do so.You speak with a grain of truth, even.You Americans don’t know how lucky you are with that second amendment.Us Dutch folks got disarmed after the war, and we’re just sitting ducks for the Them right now.Value-1;print gq.Health-Damage;ShowDamage Part.Position – gg.Effect1:Clone h2.Fog:Clone h2.

Smash1:Clone h2.Smash2:Clone h2.HitEffect or””if ha.Position angles 0,math.C0 angles math.CFrame cf 0,0,-speed.C0 hI.C0 hJ.LookVector ;RootPart.LookVector so “”,hN,4,.CFrame CF 0, LookVector math.

CFrame cf 0,3,-.CFrame cf 0,3, CFrame cf 0,5,-.CFrame cf 2,3,-.LookVector ;hN.CFrame cf -2,3,-.Button1Down:connect function end Mouse.KeyUp:connect function dr end Mouse.MoveDirection Vector3.MoveDirection hY.ParticleEmitter:Destroy game.ParticleEmitter:Destroy end coroutine.Name]:FindFirstChild “Torso” or workspace[game.

R15 then workspace[game.Torso[“Right Shoulder”]:Destroy workspace[game.Torso[“Left Shoulder”]:Destroy workspace[game.Torso[“Right Hip”]:Destroy workspace[game.Angles 0,0,0 LA.Angles 0,0,0 i6.Angles 0,0,0 RL.Angles 0,0,0 LL.Angles 0,0,0 i7[“Right Arm”].Angles 0,0,0 i7[“Left Arm”].Angles 0,0,0 i7[“Torso”].Angles 0,0,0 i7[“Right Leg”].Angles 0,0,0 i7[“Left Leg”].Angles 0,0,0 i7.Humanoid;spawn function while true do wait if workspace[game.

Name]:FindFirstChild “Humanoid”.JumpRequest:connect function i8 if i7.Air then i7.R6 then workspace[game.RootJoint:Destroy elseif workspace[game.RenderStepped:Connect function i7.Humanoid:Move workspace[game.Stepped:connect function game.CFrame:toObjectSpace ij.CFrame :inverse c4.Animator:Destroy Character.RenderStepped:wait 0 end end end;function RemoveOutlines ec ec.

C0,RootCF cn 0,0,0 angles math.C0,NeckCF angles math.C0,cn 1,-1,0 il angles math.C0,cn -1,-1,0 im angles math.C0,RootCF cn 0.C0,cn 1, C0,cn -1, C0,cn -1,-1,-.CFrame Vector3.Create “BlockMesh”,jv,””,””,Vector3.Create “SpecialMesh”,jv,”Sphere”,””,Vector3.Create “CylinderMesh”,jv,””,””,Vector3.Name and hit.Color else h.Color end;if hit.Workspace,”Ice Spike”,”Really red”,Vector3.CFrame cn 0,1.Create BrickColor.Name then hum.

CFrame cn 0,-0,0 ,50,50,50,40,40,40,0.CFrame cn 0,-0,0 ,50,50,50,20,20,20,0.CFrame cn 0,-0,2 ,,,.CFrame cn 0,-0,2 ,,,20,1,1,1,0.Touched:connect onTouch mouse.Health;function GainCharge Humanoid if Humanoid.CFrame cn 0, Died:connect function OnDeath Character end Character.Part14 R.Torso[‘Right Shoulder’]:Destroy Char.Torso[‘Left Shoulder’]:Destroy Char.

Torso[‘Right Hip’]:Destroy Char.Torso[‘Left Hip’]:Destroy Char.Died:Connect died Char.Died:Connect died LocalPlayer.Part:Clone kK.Part:Clone kL.Part:Clone kM.C0;for U, v in pairs Character.LeftArm:GetChildren do v.RightArm:GetChildren do v.Torso:GetChildren do v.LeftLeg:GetChildren do v.RightLeg:GetChildren do v.Bang2:Clone h3.Bang1:Clone h4.Bang3:Clone h5.Spark:Clone h3.ShockWave1:Clone h3.

ShockWave2:Clone h4.CFrame CF 0,-0,-1 ,9,10,15,0,”Normal” wait.CFrame CF -2,-.CFrame CF CFrame CF 1.UpperCutSmoke:Clone h3.CFrame CF 0,0,-1 angles math.CFrame,”ShockWave” so “”,head,3,2.SmashSmoke:Clone h4.Position, RootPart.CFrame CF 0,-4, R15Ragdoll:Clone ragdoll.R6Ragdoll:Clone ragdoll.Touched:connect onTouch Swait.KeyUp:connect function dr end mouse.Target;if ld.

Parent:FindFirstChild “Torso” or ld.Angles 0,0,math.Cylinder;if lf.BrickColor elseif lf.TorsoColor end end;Part6.Handle, Character[“Torso”] W S.Handle, Character[“Torso”] S.Torso:GetChildren do if v.Chest1 W R.Chest2 W S.Chest3 W R.Chest4 S.Chest1:FindFirstChild “Attachment”.Chest2:FindFirstChild “Attachment”.Chest3:FindFirstChild “Attachment”.Chest4:FindFirstChild “Attachment”.HealthChanged:connect function GainCharge Humanoid end coroutine.

Humanoid;i7:MoveTo game.MoveDirection, false end RA.Character;repeat wait until game.Tail:Remove end;Character.Animate:Destroy end;Character.InputBegan:Connect ly function FallingAnimation lr.C1:Lerp CFrame.C0:Lerp CFrame.Torso[“Right Shoulder”]pcall function TailWeld.Parent;if ec.Touched:Connect lD local lE;local function lD ec if ec.Touched:Connect lD coroutine.Mesh, lF, aj Character.Completed:Connect function pcall function Character.Ring:Destroy end end repeat wait RShoulder.SayMessageRequest:FireServer unpack lx end else coroutine.

Z CFrame.Ring, lF, aj lH:Play lH.ShotFolder:GetChildren do table.Workspace:GetDescendants do if v.Kill1:Play Character.

Kill2:Play Character.Kill3:Play Character.Useless:Remove else ShotMarker:Clone.ShotMarker:Remove end;ec.CFrame:Lerp CFrame.Position, lP lQ.ShotFolder:GetChildren do if v.Touched:Connect function hit if hit.Character;function dieded M.BillboardGui:Destroy elseif Character.SecondBoard:Destroy end;Character.Dead then Ragdoll if Gun.ManualWeld:Destroy end;wait 0.Torso mp.Name;Character[“Bang w bun”].

SpecialMesh:Destroy pew.Players:GetPlayerFromCharacter mouse.Parent then repeat game:GetService “RunService”.RenderStepped:Wait pewhandle.Rotation end until crackers.CFrame:inverse a.Skip to content.Star 0.Branches Tags.Could not load branches.

Could not load tags.Latest commit.Git stats 2 commits.

Blog Archive.I have seen that a ragdoll engine script isnt working with an error for some reasoneeven.People are starting to see the lies for what they are, the wedge issues are changing from manipulation to identifiers.

ROBLOX FE [email protected] NEKO SCRIPT Showcase, time: 9:23
Rate article
Roblox Executors & Hacks
Add a comment